Gen-art LC (and telechat) review: draft-ietf-calext-rscale-04
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Tue, 03 March 2015 17:02 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94B31AC3B9; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 09:02:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KFe95x6r94y4; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 09:02:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4705F1AC3D1; Tue, 3 Mar 2015 09:02:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unnumerable.local (pool-71-96-107-228.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.96.107.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t23H2i0s037985 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:02:44 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host pool-71-96-107-228.dllstx.fios.verizon.net [71.96.107.228] claimed to be unnumerable.local
Message-ID: <54F5E92F.7030002@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 11:02:39 -0600
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, calsify@ietf.org, draft-ietf-calext-rscale@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Gen-art LC (and telechat) review: draft-ietf-calext-rscale-04
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ldobq2tbpZddzf3VPxRjOge6z68>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 17:02:49 -0000
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-calext-rscale-04 Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review Date: 03-03-2015 IETF LC End Date: 03-03-2015 IESG Telechat date: 03-05-2015 Summary: Ready modulo one nit This draft reads easily (describing the actual work converting between calendars is hard, but this draft doesn't have to talk about that). The body of the draft says it updates 5546 and 4791, but those are not listed in the Updates: line in the header?
- Gen-art LC (and telechat) review: draft-ietf-cale… Robert Sparks
- Re: Gen-art LC (and telechat) review: draft-ietf-… Cyrus Daboo
- Re: Gen-art LC (and telechat) review: draft-ietf-… Robert Sparks
- Re: Gen-art LC (and telechat) review: draft-ietf-… Jari Arkko