IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed Update to Note Well

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Fri, 22 June 2012 01:02 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D500B11E8083; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ml9YfxY2v66; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D7F11E8072; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by dacx6 with SMTP id x6so1650872dac.31 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=xTgmiz3nmm5lxNeyAd7KzSaQX6Yp9RzjrtAbO2esZg8=; b=pxqCP5QgTo1rd3C4VnNN9NORC6M804ije3zeQ2djDEBsBbcU2XdYJFx0J5V/yhjZ+R ioGHzVRwvqNvqBSS/z4eEeiRLrOX+PeOKoxzVDZYKBj+a8MkY8mhrIkM8agBK16B+mc3 x6egobC4mK2puv5Z/jkFdHehyPUw9A9odvpmD/xL1M9obOP3xEFWvR1Mj4BisqaetHuu RlGwna4rDnBhw8n6caiI/75vEweZdDCjA+lICS3cgKUgZzIg84GjJrxlyk51vFV45PiD rsxozHj/KIMSNbDsHqxPyImfA7MqlhihaHXVFVwA70Pq0L2y1qHp1KwPrzW0WWONHHIF g14g==
Received: by 10.68.238.68 with SMTP id vi4mr3839489pbc.123.1340326940103; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.220.132 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:01:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8B7419F5-0C5C-473A-8EC0-1B8A483171D8@ietf.org>
References: <4FCF5B92.3070703@qualcomm.com> <4FCF5F99.3060807@cisco.com> <4FCF6BD5.7080503@qualcomm.com> <4FCF8471.2050701@cisco.com> <AEF1278E-68D1-47D3-932A-8B4940E864A0@harvard.edu> <4FD0679D.60304@cisco.com> <4FD068BC.5050405@cs.tcd.ie> <CAP0PwYZb87zRv0HpTES1twLnnTWUk9ft80bupUoB5f62P3eL=A@mail.gmail.com> <4FD0A53A.6010406@innovationslab.net> <4FD0AAA5.3060400@cisco.com> <C07B527F-37D1-4340-BF7D-F1B6BD263726@gmail.com> <4FD0B3A1.7090001@qualcomm.com> <4FD0B3FA.90704@qualcomm.com> <CAP0PwYYjbaHqkk7z5dXBB4kcH=NhT5_MofHFpwpgXnXvBG_tKQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FD0B86E.8020008@qualcomm.com> <CALaySJKSzsgpmxaiTsHMAEBJNTyPGScMnsfTM=rbMiMEUREb6w@mail.gmail.com> <BD3F594E-0ED1-4079-836F-5D7F5D63AD91@harvard.edu> <CAP0PwYam-arXn1vYebn16d7b_paD7P9ZwKhG1aYgCo2yxuUWaQ@mail.gmail.com> <4FD0F8C5.8000100@qualcomm.com> <4FD10927.8020906@qualcomm.com> <CALaySJ+cMTbcsQQXTa4xhxS+0jBHah4XBXuHEeo4+i2iv1cRVg@mail.gmail.com> <F1B6C50A-C9D2-46F6-B068-EBED878CC0AD@vigilsec.com> <8B7419F5-0C5C-473A-8EC0-1B8A483171D8@ietf.org>
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 21:01:59 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPv4CP9FqeZ5UdtR-O0uy0tKxOHaZEsrRz-friF22nkKL-y=RA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed Update to Note Well
To: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b33960125d56804c3052f4c"
Cc: IETF Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:02:21 -0000

Nice job.  One comment:

On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 6:10 PM, IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org> allegedly
wrote:

>   If you write, say, or discuss anything in the IETF, formally or
> informally,
>

Can you fit "even between meetings" at the end of this line?  Some people
will think "in the IETF" refers to physical meetings, and may not get
through the detailed info that comes later.


>   (all of which we call "a contribution") that you know is covered by a
> patent
>   or patent application you or your employer own, one of you must disclose
>   that.


I also like know -> believe.

Thanks ... Scott

v2.20.3 | Report a Bug | By Email