Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options

John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Tue, 28 September 2004 11:37 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA14498; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:37:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCGQS-0007MM-5x; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:45:44 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CCGDy-00052g-Va; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:32:50 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CCG8g-0004cq-8n for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:27:22 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA14062 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:27:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ns.jck.com ([209.187.148.211] helo=bs.jck.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CCGGU-0007Dr-Nc for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:35:27 -0400
Received: from [209.187.148.215] (helo=scan.jck.com) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CCG8U-000K0X-W8; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:27:11 -0400
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 07:27:10 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>, Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>, ietf@ietf.org
Message-ID: <454DCF8DE6D4C10F82E806E7@scan.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <C4A184C3B6756B0AD785E11A@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
References: <2004927153921.674789@bbprime> <C4A184C3B6756B0AD785E11A@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0a7aa2e6e558383d84476dc338324fab
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Reminder: Poll about restructuring options
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 244a2fd369eaf00ce6820a760a3de2e8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


--On Tuesday, 28 September, 2004 09:07 +0200 Harald Tveit
Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:

> 
> 
> --On 27. september 2004 15:39 -0700 Dave Crocker
> <dhc2@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:30:50 +0200, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
>> wrote:
>>>  The poll about restructuring options:
>>>  <http://tools.ietf.org/poll/admin_scenario_alternatives/>
>>>  is open until Wednesday.
>> 
>> 
>> The poll asks whether one has an opinion and, if one has an
>> opinion, whether if favors either of two choices.
>> 
>> The poll provides no way for other, basic, important and
>> logical opinions, such as whether both choices are
>> inappropriate.
>> 
>> That makes this a rather exclusionary survey.
> 
> In that case, you are in the "No, I do not wish to state an
> opinion" camp for this question. Your particular reasons for
> not wanting to state an opinion are your own, and well known
> to the IETF list.

Harald, one of the things one learns rather quickly when
actually studying either polling technique or the use of
pseudo-polls to manipulate opinion, is that the "no answer"
category of questions is very important, both with regard to how
it they are stated and with regard to how they are interpreted.  

To combine "I don't have an opinion", "I don't think the options
provided here even approximately represents my opinion", "I have
an opinion but am fearful about telling you", "this discussion
has been so confusing that I have no way to decide", I don't
choose to spend my time worrying about things like this", is
tricky business, however unintentionally.  Doing so with a
single question identified as "No, I do not wish to state an
opinion" makes it worse in some ways.   At a minimum, one should
be extremely careful in interpreting answers to that sort of
question.  And one should be equally careful in interpreting any
of the other answers if this option gets non-trivial answers.

These issues are, of course, among the reasons why the IETF
traditionally doesn't vote... or even conduct "please, everyone
should/must participate" polls.

    john






_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf