Re: Proposed New Note Well

<lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> Tue, 22 March 2016 01:56 UTC

Return-Path: <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8FF12D194 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.co.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hclnHGKCnSYW for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:56:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm26.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm26.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.96.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FBB312D11C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:56:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.uk; s=s2048; t=1458611810; bh=A3cwgeO/TKkhl9Xy5avL75gcK9kliFhQ1mwCgK1c5Yo=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=XLru2j/AHGHscgBH9uAoEs2yN3yPckXuW4CpE9AuWm8EEDRigS2JgZpKICTsCbYh0iqh5xI69vcOepIApKeV9IU5GayR/FWM9i/zbpdA+EksARX6I57at33cMNzr6V64lr3fY2d5wJ0THSXQ0/pR/VXrRAOL5vuEaPXJ/argBpnNjt/BCZtZR3Jc7X5JeRyoSs/d4bXZSf1XPLOQPkPlHpD9eB2eM6AUatkQJXd7Xk82OzHDYOyU0tvUr72USfJsU1OyGdj36IjvbqGQo9PU/uq8mwhBHMv/aiziwSbMVKATFw5GbJj5JhKNnVGFz8YGb7w+h/ieQ170GzFAMzE3jQ==
Received: from [212.82.98.49] by nm26.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Mar 2016 01:56:50 -0000
Received: from [212.82.98.104] by tm2.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Mar 2016 01:56:50 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1041.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Mar 2016 01:56:50 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 516849.67796.bm@omp1041.mail.ir2.yahoo.com
X-YMail-OSG: bKuPBsQVM1msWpjkjlplQlkyS5tO7ypMPIb5LeQ9XKOiO9Pbwo0NIwVDnMAM9b. 3sjYJsMX75Y77Pw1cbjSzDUWCvaF4ViQliD.VvPReKHZPN1iD13kLYTBcxzAfPK66qDDFnzQf.sJ h5gQMVawP66q5zAZ4FVQDaKXBzNm4FpLo3A_hmSkDiQM7d2gf5xMoHmgB3refAAWmah1YtFo53dz MvKc3s2bwmVbfdESSEw1MFBHhdSbT7gt9.kXOPlWR.TfVaulLndIB4aJoiaFO55rYuuqn8lhIBwe UyYX00KjF2uamqGC0goSf_Rck2Jlffz9k.HXpKCnxBBjGsCWm.PYOHqxkRBq_MX3W.D4ELf.d41e bMj0wIRAG_vmyoiUOckrXZdiDjC4N4tOZbfBhLp0q9H5F2O8c6ra.CkqQzoWpta1wh_OP4daGkko GqG742HCqSQ87PQS5JAviL4w181OX3unDoBI2A2i9Ny2GemdiaPkcoMrB9Z1BtC.oQTt.vxz6uIj TvOZ0GLB2HEMLvUP.S9ZX49JYcp1iIzpaLHxVyuaB
Received: by 212.82.98.116; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:56:49 +0000
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:56:49 +0000 (UTC)
From: <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <2061005430.4387801.1458611809564.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <56F09C8C.4060104@gmail.com>
References: <56F09C8C.4060104@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed New Note Well
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_4387800_869386167.1458611809560"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lmbEAUoDYYC_NKwKULgdlwYEAqI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:56:54 -0000

What about participating in the IETF by proxy,which is what corporations do?
 Lloyd Wood lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk http://about.me/lloydwood 

      From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
 To: ietf@ietf.org 
 Sent: Tuesday, 22 March 2016, 12:14
 Subject: Re: Proposed New Note Well
   
Hi,

I could live with this, although I am still happy enough with the old version.

> By participating in the IETF,

I think this should say

 By participating in the IETF in person, remotely, or on-line,

> ​BCP 25 (Working Group processes)
> BCP 25 (Anti-Harassment Procedures)

Why two separate lines, when BCP 9 (6 different RFCs) only gets one line?

Regards
  Brian