Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC
Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com> Wed, 02 November 2016 16:48 UTC
Return-Path: <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D346F129460 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uOHrlCc1-1mL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:48:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22b.google.com (mail-pf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E05D112945B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Nov 2016 09:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id d2so14877406pfd.0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 09:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:to:references:reply-to:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OzCIqF1Qri9CnU9QTIt85E71QXKlIiQ+FQya8PMHOfA=; b=MXPGIvYnE9X4U6KaWK8l1SdU5QZ/urkcYljCML5MGMNTpH0MItsQz9/4lmMuiqMhzb jCZnv7axzDTMLoChtWWI/qMCd5upl8z4gtgKVNY7h7oogHYi3MevmXaBOBFChUFgDHd1 MUilRDTIHA1YYFtJzTGG0Mmql+wPGtU0Huug+D/QRwOroP9gZTNkXF4t9RLW6pXuI/8B N5YbPjcTli60WY791nqgbIe2mlJGW7iU7zSkx+PPat/5X+MbEgkju0imngG738UAaHcd SitDsiOK/WeBpK2cOH0iV10/YIQG60mBmXCv+mYVSf6k58zUxZ5NPoSxUd2DmCzIQRz3 f9/Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:reply-to:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=OzCIqF1Qri9CnU9QTIt85E71QXKlIiQ+FQya8PMHOfA=; b=iGCHyw5142hMBfE5/ZELUKp1XZAMGyw/TuWZ6EQdUzaI2eAhdomgBFFgbsH5kwLuUW 64eRw8GtzcfeGcotmELwXSbQNj+u8YF2Vza1I8ngbUj2Cylo20y7dwFl4o6WRD2UT3KC XELzJuX8jmTv7BFGClgGoUlNTn2C8cof2dCsrWbwbjiXQcqoLCPijNxrM5ATbYEmrUS9 Cv0JzZOZa4FpTMtA6dy4dvh/LDGTckLqcQ7wuimcNsu4v9eIAjSDNUhDaPA7dH0sqp8i E2CetkJOgsDDtLUTd1P18PkNzvh7X+jKDhtYKoeq2QpajfcuG3rO8eGMXQWClL3hpMBD X6hQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvexUyPyVTxfzmx+AhuDJGf+rdypBuvsaowM+pW2rUssK8Fxoe/8KM2ex/bLxMUvOw==
X-Received: by 10.98.93.201 with SMTP id n70mr8414089pfj.161.1478105308420; Wed, 02 Nov 2016 09:48:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.71.12.45] ([8.25.222.2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a66sm6013923pfe.51.2016.11.02.09.48.26 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Nov 2016 09:48:27 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <678C2FBA-A661-4556-A300-5C08562B5F8A@iii.ca> <20161102163641.66951.qmail@ary.lan> <CAPt1N1k1wg9mbN-guuarFP0NvX7v-suOY-bP=TDEOCVhK-epmg@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <8b38d8a3-67d8-d2b7-f70a-ba462360d12a@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 09:48:24 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1k1wg9mbN-guuarFP0NvX7v-suOY-bP=TDEOCVhK-epmg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lrqgI8d4gXa7X-IgYqYPYH_6GaI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2016 16:48:31 -0000
On 11/2/2016 9:37 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: > And yet it is still happening, despite there being a great deal of > discussion in the archives... :/ Indeed. The question is convergence on rough consensus for how to handle this, differently than deciding to do nothing (which arguably has been the rough consensus choice to date.) So the question is not 'what should be done' but rather 'who has a proposal and can get rough consensus for it'? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Dave Crocker
- IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Cullen Jennings
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- RE: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- RE: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John R Levine
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Dave Crocker
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Paul Hoffman
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John C Klensin
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Yoav Nir
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Yoav Nir
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brandon Long
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Cullen Jennings
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Cullen Jennings
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC S Moonesamy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Identification of an email author (was - Re: [dma… Dave Crocker
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Terry Zink
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Next step on IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Alexey Melnikov
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Bob Hinden
- RE: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC MH Michael Hammer (5304)
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Terry Zink
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Steve Atkins
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Theodore Ts'o
- Options for temporary operational solution to DMA… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Franck Martin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Hector Santos
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John C Klensin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Ted Lemon
- Re: IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC John C Klensin
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… John Leslie
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Terry Zink
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Ted Lemon
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… John Levine
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Terry Zink
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Ted Lemon
- RE: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Christian Huitema
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Michael Richardson
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Michael Richardson
- Re: Options for temporary operational solution to… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Franck Martin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Khaled Omar
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… S Moonesamy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] IETF Mailing Lists and DMARC Brandon Long
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… ned+ietf
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Franck Martin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… John C Klensin
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Identification of an email autho… Brandon Long