IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 04 December 2012 17:47 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C649D21F8C60 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:47:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C6kUJQ9j8h-A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B78F21F8C5E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:47:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.9] (adsl-67-127-190-125.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.127.190.125]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qB4HlOx0026768 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 4 Dec 2012 09:47:25 -0800
Message-ID: <50BE3721.90004@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:47:13 -0800
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121026 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
Subject: Re: Simplifying our processes: Conference Calls
References: <84D0B79A-6D53-47DD-99B8-BC6C18614C74@gmx.net> <50BCCE1D.5070001@gmail.com> <999913AB42CC9341B05A99BBF358718D022E05E1@FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net> <50BDB6A0.8000201@bogus.com> <999913AB42CC9341B05A99BBF358718D022E061C@FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <999913AB42CC9341B05A99BBF358718D022E061C@FIESEXC035.nsn-intra.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Tue, 04 Dec 2012 09:47:25 -0800 (PST)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 17:47:44 -0000

On 12/4/2012 12:51 AM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>> I belive you're drawing a distinction between conference call and
>> virtual interim which does not presently exist. It could, but doesn't.
>
> No, I am not doing that. I know that we call conference calls virtual interim meetings.
>
> I also attend various working group meetings during an IETF week just to see what is going on but I do not randomly join conference calls of groups where I am not subscribed. Are you joining calls of groups you do not care enough about to look at the mailing list?


You appear to be using your personal choices as a basis for making a 
conceptual distinction.  It does not matter what the statistics of the 
choices are.

The concept is simple:  a time-specific gather is a meeting.  Meetings 
require prior announcement beyond the working group.

d/

-- 
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email