Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment
Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> Wed, 28 May 2025 03:35 UTC
Return-Path: <noloader@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA842DA7A53; Tue, 27 May 2025 20:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Ne-tnxSEL_3; Tue, 27 May 2025 20:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22b.google.com (mail-lj1-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D79C22DA7A4A; Tue, 27 May 2025 20:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-32a6fc6f1e2so4453031fa.1; Tue, 27 May 2025 20:35:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1748403344; x=1749008144; darn=ietf.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :reply-to:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RMPWXqzszQXUj3kTTzhEGkfEUYAnn9m53zwT5rbuw0c=; b=Z8C3c4UMGcqrHGoS1DB1ZlX+L1gzOOWdVrs5DF6vGbwlCtHYgDgr8XTH/WGR+OS9hd S6RsgwJSR6xVDn3vV7q75qqL4I7nz3zLOXGgt2x+GoiVidde+S0AECn7ZP+F2l5y0ekc ecL+dILc3M0yoWbLtPIgAYBKfGlsYNaFUYtRbA24W1zwFYkFy2hkKaZz0HBwL/XkVzvE G7XixWl5vJ3VrFaPCdHCvcUe5VQe0QFk9JWCpC+wV177Wpgd5rKE9P3O8pAe5iiXWxex Q8VqZj+HxhSaQIF3xKghLaLKMb+iaAItALIC5bmq2gP2TUg9xgoZvaMRFS0eUPCiAcu1 55XQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1748403344; x=1749008144; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :reply-to:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=RMPWXqzszQXUj3kTTzhEGkfEUYAnn9m53zwT5rbuw0c=; b=fRVrnPA4u0SbCF4fZ8+yIes46cNhWPCXBRdTOsDHiNKOx3M51wWVt1mpt5KStpRvB/ haZEmB6e427XCSkOqY7XEaKqkgOIQBtWnOg456R9/Dg7bdtzoBzIiV98pOs668eZ3uwP 7QSlA6LV/poqLyOfbAYJTyBQIQvai69EB39L1H3eVeO3ttmp12KThDdnOPayWdx+aJFw 78kL4b6rEQaKCGOuPU5xhK8SJ5OhPyjnyO4J+uzRaFLqAYl5FQN4PGVlLZKTKd5AJ6tR Vpf4YI+Yv4sPUoCWd0GTgQIgvT+xtukAslETijPESc3gHXHZE6Xd27MQ3KfDy9SjPd9x R1qA==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXob1KUWkLpf1gv4vfs0MEB+W3jHZChmcNau51OQt2tTZ3Pc4UdXLWTxXWeupkYc7WcxmMw@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxEK5Hr/O5Dl2Ee9D/55CdadKj2k5//1seUSBQoOxYkdX7ljbMt 9AWBfaxDBT1jIU6u5Zy86hbvCRV61d0vezrZtWKBV2xf9s6UjzAJeSypJRyHuFB0CnZh82bwnva AS0Jlw4H2hyLx4jWS367hSvowGb1/xKH7EEwE
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncu1XskLYmrPGmwstuig+EkKNjBe7+EDuQFA9BUNWUeir4edBaS4Vc4CbkugpgA pK9EU1UB2xFJzI1GgRO783sgpBqR+/luPb0ViJ42KvsENrrRfNjykjSf+dSEr5K9/wRHkjLKPbP DWIPqlPp8qWcfrswLeIM7A5VcGH8ZAj7o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFpU5cQkMM6nG757HGZwT82Et9sFWzAZegevjptPfW9b8bAAqTAQuaQpdTNukFP3FY6apaE6d0rDBMr7SC3pNE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:146f:b0:309:bc3:3a71 with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-3295bada9cdmr50139761fa.31.1748403344142; Tue, 27 May 2025 20:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <0E13A03E-3B81-4C9C-976E-B8C68810B486@ietf.org> <30493a61-57b6-4155-9d8e-d2ba82724ca2@lear.ch>
In-Reply-To: <30493a61-57b6-4155-9d8e-d2ba82724ca2@lear.ch>
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2025 23:35:07 -0400
X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFsns2BzxkB1Kh704xN-RIZXD_SZ54aFfchJfLBX7fFIxXd1YDpJAImBMXM
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8=uQOkXaE4eXD0UV+r4jpHKjrjTVbMYdEs+656U1EnkLg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment
To: Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: 2F6ARPISSBFCOWN2ROLK3NBEF5MO23LA
X-Message-ID-Hash: 2F6ARPISSBFCOWN2ROLK3NBEF5MO23LA
X-MailFrom: noloader@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: The IETF List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Reply-To: noloader@gmail.com
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lvDVhWl-UjaB2tIbyrfZF_2eY70>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 3:57 PM Eliot Lear <lear@lear.ch> wrote: > > Jay, > > I realize the LLC has a difficult choice, but I am shocked and dismayed by this decision. The federal government of the United States is paralyzed in all constructive ways, but not in their attacks on immigrants and trans people. It was reported in the New York Times yesterday that the FDA will highly restrict access to COVID vaccines, risking epidemics throughout the US. My in-person attendance would risk either direct harm to me, my loved ones, and friends, and it would marginalize those I care about. > > I will not attend. Also see "U.S. Added to Global Human Rights Watchlist", <https://time.com/7266334/us-human-rights-watchlist-civil-liberties/>. Are we great again yet? Jeff > On 22.05.2025 21:38, IETF Executive Director wrote: > > At its annual onsite retreat held in Amsterdam 6-7 May 2025, the IETF Administration LLC Board reviewed its decision to hold IETF 127, 14-20 November 2026, in San Francisco, USA. This follows on from a series of events with the most recent being the board meeting on 16 April 2025 where the board considered the responses to its call for feedback [1] and received direct feedback from a number of IETF participants. We received a lot of constructive and diverse responses and we understand the various concerns raised. > > The board has reached a final decision that IETF 127 will go ahead in San Francisco as planned. > > In reaching this decision, the board reassessed this meeting with regards to the requirements of BCP 226 [2] and concluded that it remains consistent with the criteria in the BCP. It also considered the viability of the meeting and concluded that there will be sufficient participation for the meeting to be financially viable and to meet the threshold set by the IESG for a technically viable meeting [3]. > > The board sincerely thanks all of those that have provided feedback on this complex issue. > > [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/STQXuEgpsJp8JJ0SRh1OghDb2XY/ > [2] https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/bcp226 > [3] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/Vmsojml9ghvSFbxNrDB9EU5KwNg/ >
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Eliot Lear
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jeffrey Walton
- Fwd: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Fwd: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment S Moonesamy
- Re: Fwd: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Rob Sayre
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment IETF Executive Director
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment John C Klensin
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Corinne Cath
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment John Levine
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Jay Daley
- Re: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment Ted Hardie