Re: Fwd: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Fri, 06 June 2025 07:04 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietf@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0363531A25A9 for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 00:04:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YuYJAfdAEEJJ for <ietf@mail2.ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 00:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5344631A25A2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2025 00:04:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([102.117.94.128]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 55673PWV004459 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Jun 2025 00:03:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1749193438; x=1749279838; i=@elandsys.com; bh=Vss1pThpxJpYSHI6bfmWLJpX8nX9Nuzk/VkEajtgOIQ=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=MrGyYDdKApHdmjEoPrrVT0GL9mL/EWmd+eL2mLawOJFpHplhQmRbMOwdp0jGiE1XL rmtU5dA9CHlIwkPzkadiug005HZnkVZfJoxhwIMRnGM3y9ZRv7rI0qitvHS3eOY185 y6ykrQ8TEJF9+5ZWX57kbdt7w2WwPxoXkQ7B/tno=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20250605233810.0ac03900@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2025 23:48:29 -0700
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: IETF 127 San Francisco reassessment
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMA__=wsDz1w=y5OaG1-aD5TvsMDiPSG+Z-60MYQwrO2GQ@mail.g mail.com>
References: <0E13A03E-3B81-4C9C-976E-B8C68810B486@ietf.org> <CA+9kkMBoDhQq4GROSYQ0AjJ3Um-7XsL6D8s+R+rRDkX8fv-NnA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMA__=wsDz1w=y5OaG1-aD5TvsMDiPSG+Z-60MYQwrO2GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID-Hash: 4QWVQLH53WZAE26BMSU6BMPDQSXXKW2H
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4QWVQLH53WZAE26BMSU6BMPDQSXXKW2H
X-MailFrom: sm@elandsys.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/m-B-cK1jyQMdYNFG-wkj2WZFJvc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>

Hi Ted,
At 02:47 AM 23-05-2025, Ted Hardie wrote:
>10-08.pdf .  I believe it is very important that the community 
>understand the IESG's conclusion here, in addition to the IETF 
>LLC's, as the IESG is charged with the standards process and part of 
>the risk here is to the standards process.

There were several questions in the email which you sent about two 
weeks ago.  I could not find any replies in the mailing list 
archives.  Did you receive any response to those questions?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy