Re: BoF's in the Age of Covids

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Mon, 11 May 2020 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1EF53A0D9F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DjTqcrZMj4g8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BBE23A0EA0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF10389A4; Mon, 11 May 2020 19:12:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id Py1UeLbC75-w; Mon, 11 May 2020 19:12:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9737F389A3; Mon, 11 May 2020 19:12:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFBC50E; Mon, 11 May 2020 19:14:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: BoF's in the Age of Covids
In-Reply-To: <4db0288e-4910-670a-7897-fffe68d06982@mtcc.com>
References: <4db0288e-4910-670a-7897-fffe68d06982@mtcc.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 19:14:06 -0400
Message-ID: <19600.1589238846@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/m-eFcniZuonMxPpiD1e7yv7cvtY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 23:14:29 -0000

Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com> wrote:
    > It's been my impression that a substantial amount of the work for
    > putting together BoF's, etc has been done loosely and informally
    > usually in the setting of a meeting and drinking beers with others (aka
    > bar BoF). Since we seem to be doing neither neither these days, from
    > what I can tell this list is the closest to that in purpose. Yet since
    > it's ietf-wide it includes lots of different areas and interests it's
    > easy to see how the signal to noise ratio might get bad in a

I agree that ietf@ietf.org is a good starting point, but I think one needs to
take a bit of a shotgun to a half-dozen other MLs to let people know you are
thinking of something.  ietf@ietf.org is not universally read, alas.
Also making use of Any-of-Other-Business section of other virtual interims to
talk briefly about things.   I wouldn't be afraid of babbling about such
things in the jabber, DURING (virtual) meetings, but also in hallway@

Our new tradition of "dispatch" areas is also a good thing.

People write drafts, and it might be that intentionally invoking Cunningham's
Law is a good idea.

    > it. With a bar BoF it is much easier to gauge interest given the number
    > of people who show up, and the number of beers consumed. 

agreed.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [