Re: Hotel situation

Brian Rosen <br@salsgiver.com> Thu, 17 December 2015 17:44 UTC

Return-Path: <br@salsgiver.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE921B3004 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:44:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4yMOijnKoCHR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from email.salsgiver.com (email.salsgiver.com [206.67.234.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FD401B2FFE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 09:44:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.33.192.14] ([156.154.81.54]) (authenticated bits=0) by email.salsgiver.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id tBHHiS7s006189; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:44:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from br@salsgiver.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
Subject: Re: Hotel situation
From: Brian Rosen <br@salsgiver.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcf=yAAGVN35tUCpX38y6_qGstGhK4iYuyhK94LVWrz-+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 12:44:29 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <A70E2B75-8BEC-4799-BC21-628A34E7ADBF@salsgiver.com>
References: <567192F3.9090506@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09BC1@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <56719864.8010604@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09C09@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <56719B42.2040902@gmail.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1512160924570.39773@rabdullah.local> <D296DF8F.8DA39%glenn.deen@nbcuni.com> <1DEF233B-FBA8-4750-AB4B-3E0F55822C9E@isoc.org> <D297326B.8DCF8%glenn.deen@nbcuni.com> <CAC8QAcf=yAAGVN35tUCpX38y6_qGstGhK4iYuyhK94LVWrz-+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: sarikaya@ieee.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.1 at email.salsgiver.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/m3OMQ2J3Gt-eXiMBiVTVFrEWeV4>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 08:56:41 -0800
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:44:37 -0000

>> We could still do the 1:1:1 rotation, but with perhaps 2 or 3 favored
>> locations in each of the 1:1:1 regions.  Having a couple in each region
>> gives us a fall back if something isn't available and a better negotiating
>> position.
>> 
>> This might look like:   Vancouver/Japan/Honolulu/? for AP,
>> Berlin/Paris/Prague/? for EU and San Diego/Vancouver/Boston/Philadelphia/?
>> for NA.
>> 
Minneapolis!!!!!!