IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Oauth blog post

Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> Sun, 29 July 2012 20:52 UTC

Return-Path: <glenzorn@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7637521F84F2 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pypSiv+P6RO6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E762E21F849D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so8599916pbc.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:organization :date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=hKqcpFaqXKIPrpDK4+ptylt1o5JVJ20lZmsmTvUe92U=; b=pg4sXmHGN6w2NdrEDUHArH85tjARIM+xoMDFilrpA3z5/DTzgeKppeVOzR4qLnK61P 1IB+LtJFghdHhbrMyNolB5mCZA825wL1cE8wNAHZb6E7QdbfTcCmefwVSmvPqv63D7dd Zf7dVIib6uw7hCCdyenSRcRyJwZKZCVjbsnFPbc+hojdNfX0K3Q1U0zGApwcKJZyQrcf nh5m16WOaZgbGb6LcfmX+5KBOlOb4vbRVPnI2+uZ6+bkchMInmdbyPkekVyKOs1B21WO nA6zJUhy5debgugMGXHkelUYsZnc+B4RaCUq6xZBgf0DOye9ECo1ybGQLPTzCw5rrFaX tnRg==
Received: by 10.66.85.135 with SMTP id h7mr19858912paz.75.1343595122745; Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.195] (216-19-185-109.dyn.novuscom.net. [216.19.185.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id rg10sm6402508pbc.54.2012.07.29.13.52.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:52:02 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Oauth blog post
From: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
In-Reply-To: <1876CD0A-DD0A-4253-B559-0A4F041DA3DE@checkpoint.com>
References: <501531F7.5040404@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120729073422.06d8fe10@resistor.net> <39B73AD9-4E8F-4E94-A538-69BE5D8C0E18@gmx.net> <1343593068.9245.0.camel@gwz-laptop> <1876CD0A-DD0A-4253-B559-0A4F041DA3DE@checkpoint.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-1wnUKJi9OY0vzDDNNXih"
Organization: Network Zen
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 13:52:00 -0700
Message-ID: <1343595120.6354.2.camel@gwz-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 (2.32.3-1.fc14)
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:52:03 -0000

On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 23:37 +0300, Yoav Nir wrote:

...


> >> The IETF allows open participation and, as such, everyone, including companies that develop enterprise software, are free to participate in the discussions. 
> >> 
> >> Do you think open participation is wrong?
> > 
> > Do you think that corporate domination of "open" standards development is OK?
> 
> Hi
> 
> Like Dale, I haven't followed the play throughout the life of OAuth (the working group)
> 
> Who are these corporations that dominate the working group?  


The particulars are immaterial.  The question was as general (& I
suppose, philosophical) as Hannes'.


> Are they content providers like Facebook, Twitter, or Disney?  Are they ISPs? Is it General Motors?
> 
> If they are the people who are supposed to use these standards, their participation is a good thing. I wish we had more users (corporate or others) in the Security Area. So who are they?
> 
> Yoav

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status