IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Montevideo statement

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 10 October 2013 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3C521F9E12 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:32:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.002, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JYru1e41zg-1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og117.obsmtp.com (exprod7og117.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E117721F8423 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob117.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUlbyrAKpFwDpzXpBG+F08oGLac0W6tQj@postini.com; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:32:26 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519E61B82EA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3464119005C; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:32:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Thu, 10 Oct 2013 11:32:11 -0700
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1812\))
Subject: Re: Montevideo statement
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALw3TGGkSmxz-+HPAwqF-JAv3EZjfHPTwEgJjq3Lz+e_BRDq7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 14:32:09 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <5796ADF9-DEAB-4FF4-B6D4-441ED7D0BD78@nominum.com>
References: <ABCF1EB7-3437-4EC3-B0A8-0EDB2EDEA538@ietf.org> <20131007225129.GA572@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <6.2.5.6.2.20131008213432.0c1e4b30@resistor.net> <20131009064438.GA47673@mx1.yitter.info> <E003D3DC4E4B3208CF14E8E0@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <5255A905.10700@gmail.com> <CADnDZ8-vaM64D9T79XgCzgby-6TEmgsPeEvA6XfZwwUCHtX1fA@mail.gmail.com> <CALw3TGGkSmxz-+HPAwqF-JAv3EZjfHPTwEgJjq3Lz+e_BRDq7g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Medel v6 Ramirez <mgramirez@globe.com.ph>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1812)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:33:13 -0000

On Oct 9, 2013, at 10:11 PM, Medel v6 Ramirez <mgramirez@globe.com.ph> wrote:
> Leaders were "processed" thoroughly prior to their appointment so I trust them. And that they hold through the "spirit" of being an IETF and shall be responsible under oath for any impact on the organization.

I don't know precisely what you mean by this, but I assure you that there is no oath given.   Speaking for myself, much of what I have learned about how to be a leader (at the AD level) in the IETF I have learned on the job.   This is an iterative process.   Nomcom appointees are not magical.   We do our best, and when we screw up the community corrects us, sometimes harshly, sometimes eloquently, but without fail.   This is a good thing.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email