IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Topic IPv6

Alexander Nevalennyy <avnevalenniy@gmail.com> Mon, 21 November 2016 15:02 UTC

Return-Path: <avnevalenniy@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA0E1296CB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:02:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zTWR2UnO_THs for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:02:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA1FE129AA0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:02:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id n21so353796863qka.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:02:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PegZIuM9k3MuR2fuFCFTrZDyYU4yt/r1HFtNDy3+xL8=; b=EiMcL3HCF68s2O1EyuzMzI/tsUvBzDd/7br0V78GhboM+ph4bkS7zPV2GCXBbBo2LZ oOvAzbqEO2pmWoltv/a97f2MM/VmMqDQAUR1F67s505Kjct8LijP4B3X+fHXA4rN8NoS CaEc4sojiqKWdqZ5zSFkjV8YUR9NB8lnZlG2K062Um6MnYluoCTPXpcn+QCo/250UeW5 6/auW6MS0X02SjKZoaXjAsedXZW9b3/EvjiwU2qJwS9xF72atOM3kqbzhf1ffHKlWUZR 8N2XSuS2irWVL2Odzd+rCC7jnOXf5+ytgQPSM62jASx/nlALV9teFgARDEzaaHyvTrGH 4bOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PegZIuM9k3MuR2fuFCFTrZDyYU4yt/r1HFtNDy3+xL8=; b=kw6MKhNytTbr5fIDiezNqWQoxVdrUn31zm1Rh3ew3K0N9NFwlcEYj386aiQ/lmB8yC 3OqupmI6SnEEaAqP7TpTEKi98Ty1Bt52N/ZJSVW82/0uPV0hXgaWRU/KuWmYh3a2/zXk 6roCcI9A1Hcu0ZdJSAjMKanU7QxMcD/u6u0a/aQ80i05zi8MLaCi9cVUHkZU/aTeSp8H Sep5Wone6eDP6j9KoB+5eGMQxN3nT/aLuvo7xfZtSx/Bg3qWtK6ZQC/TXfHeHZtOgjY2 XRzF9zcniVYoEvd+E95bNootW5BoQSY6gytL8BEu+pg5jLiwb9goAGd7ulH1XBlGl9Hl Vxzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC00N1lIbXUKPdWeqGrILFEfU76n7VHtnKGE+K0NBFKVwQ9kq5LRN0iSuO4sazVdaw006aUs+6L2OAw7jdg==
X-Received: by 10.55.3.2 with SMTP id 2mr17804369qkd.65.1479740568909; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:02:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.170.20 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 07:02:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20161121145039.p56dd5cpczxaivyl@nic.fr>
References: <CAGxDXJ9L-Zfu+Wn8MogOn_yKgDKKuUVyqNp5mxNYaJZd-371qA@mail.gmail.com> <20161121135800.hj773gvjquay7ka5@nic.fr> <CAGxDXJ_j+U2yngKPqK+ciHSG9B2CsTRYPq8swqbVZZBOfYB37Q@mail.gmail.com> <20161121145039.p56dd5cpczxaivyl@nic.fr>
From: Alexander Nevalennyy <avnevalenniy@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 18:02:48 +0300
Message-ID: <CAGxDXJ_zAXt_QD8vpW29vShV1enXewQ1sshZfOQd+WMU17=DTA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Topic IPv6
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114c9cc4f83c070541d0f232"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mSE-I1BN_Wkwl2aFkkVHnrTXYwQ>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 15:02:51 -0000

I know differences between anonimity and pseudonymity.
But you told about protect your rights. Working pheudonymously your realize
your rights. Nobody instead of judge can share information IP of individual.
I am opened, but what must I share to provide serious conversation?

2016-11-21 17:50 GMT+03:00 Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>:

> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 05:39:37PM +0300,
>  Alexander Nevalennyy <avnevalenniy@gmail.com> wrote
>  a message of 126 lines which said:
>
> > 1. Again, it is not about privacy. When you work with IPv6 address,
> > nobody knows that it was you, like with numbers of cell phones (if
> > you did not share information).
>
> You really should read a few texts about privacy. Here, you make the
> traditional error of mixing anonymity (no tracability) and
> pseudonymity (identifiers which are not your official name).
>
> > We are here to discuss but not only criticize (it is too simple).
>
> We cannot discuss on the basis of just a few slides. Either you have a
> serious proposal, and it can be discussed and criticized, or you just
> have a few slides and, then, I can say that I spent as much time on
> this proposal as you have spent writing it.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email