IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Old directions in social media.

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 05 January 2021 21:56 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7A13A0936 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:56:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.179
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.179 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tad5gcRqXYJ1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFB663A0907 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:56:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8B5F3E; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:56:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 05 Jan 2021 16:56:50 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=qYUzZc 24etPjppwpT7YZ0hAfijU3X2gvQsNexC5lre0=; b=WKdnog08T0yqjOj6+dIX3W t8lsTVwDT4AEhxoqi3xTOOsNQjAhq0qC0eW6B7gBRe7MdFSzQumra3ospOqAIhHi c9p0D/ixsBM5RcxvBN3IPWc4sn72Zqc7V3YorlFpNwrchTBzXx1pLx/BwMBm3TIz 2XeExpyGk+yPkR8gsF554yiYEublzWlWnPMsBe4ZzdTbuG69cDjJ87wzJ1Zr+yPs 88AJFMmFr5fcCixIyd7PmgnGHQlAF9s8tggPmLPhSAYDC9itGwnHGQa3qorohdw4 laQb2ujC3jCVHIm/AnpwSOhd7avoAEVTalLQa6/iRyhOL9IrQtpcBsTvp6i9QeMA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:oOD0X0mPv0dMuZqC0s7ueh3lAE_jEnwniYbmFKTpz9XXgN3Z4g5f5Q> <xme:oOD0Xz20jVSPMLtV-aj4sk2TiIX_OTConLguAjOnHN8OoQ6-ZiOrviFd2TD_8NkqD SD0sVx82LjSbw>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvdefjedguddulecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgesrgdtreertdefjeenucfhrhhomhepmfgvihht hhcuofhoohhrvgcuoehmohhorhgvsehnvghtfihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh eqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepveefteduieegtdelvddvtddufeejjeffvdefteejieeu lefgtdfggedtffektedunecukfhppedutdekrddvvddurddukedtrdduheenucevlhhush htvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmohhorhgvsehnvght fihorhhkqdhhvghrvghtihgtshdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:oOD0Xyrk4FUmcSgaq1Bk_BLniuIyl7HjYJmmDo1Bv7yWeZ0tS8FQfQ> <xmx:oOD0XwlOWqWYh8l1ILpQRa1OocOGkyzaSXhax-tGOgoUjwi4o61glQ> <xmx:oOD0Xy0UH4TeeEwESyh31qSnmj8EEaepz13Wb2HRGD9N13rYbv6w5A> <xmx:oeD0X7hRy0jdMMzYPqUbMDHmfhCi2zqicZxbwgJFYKAYQ_mxJP6PAw>
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9E24024005D; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 16:56:48 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Old directions in social media.
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>, Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
References: <CAJU8_nUostFKjKU43wk-RG5+8SYgMc8Ag-MWs=UXi7x8YXTaKA@mail.gmail.com> <D152D8C5-1863-4BEE-9DA4-A1C31AAC809C@network-heretics.com> <47B4988E-5865-40FF-93C4-9E7D1A63C074@akamai.com> <2353617a-2a45-9143-9529-dac1cc16634e@network-heretics.com> <CA7629F5-4DF0-4C34-92CB-A346D7ED4C1F@akamai.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <6b9496ee-18d3-91ae-2f8c-47e1c2cf9129@network-heretics.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 16:56:48 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA7629F5-4DF0-4C34-92CB-A346D7ED4C1F@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------3BD539E53271724A7AC62264"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mTtjMgXW-bRY0DpjY2PB5f-AabA>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 21:56:52 -0000

On 1/5/21 4:24 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:

>   * Yes, and now we have enough experience with this experiment to
>     know what was good and what was bad about it.   So let's learn
>     from our experience and make adjustments based on that
>     experience.  Instead of trying to cripple IETF.
>
> Strongly disagree.  But for those writing the report, here’s some 
> anecdata: The HTTPAPI working group would be ineffective if it weren’t 
> working on GitHub. Looking at the membership list, we have key players 
> from all sorts of HTTP API frameworks.
>
handwaving.   Even if I believed you, there's not enough information to 
even evaluate that statement.  For instance, I can't tell whether 
HTTPAPI would be "ineffective" because it wouldn't be excluding so many 
contributors whose opinions would have to be considered, or for some 
other reason.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email