Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 19 April 2016 12:03 UTC
Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A812D12D656 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 05:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8KE39E0wqPAw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 05:03:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0EC412DD59 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 05:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id g184so15917078lfb.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 05:02:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bkw17dICZlyzCbYHiq9dIhnaZq1I0yg/GLFlXICHkHs=; b=n+gkBTlEISuAwieXO1ONvSXRwDKqatZfpsSqctzGQ9MwgZJN+jQTjao3cVaIR9ShOH Ds5l0SbZ08/0AAl1t/aYPlegL/W7zpBZjPig+aiBEPIr5HsXReiRfDuSRID+F84o7EqM 5GkT+uucxvV2rz4FBExhytuyf9lgIYJXgbwBziHtX48w28ipFhRwUIAH2vJT058YWk1+ zG/+wh6kAbLciMC83igLnEpPCLQltMKZ+s7D5gXRHX8MIKKbRORbDcIWQSgCidq4Jm9C oSBJdtV4vNawx4Y8lv0HXdiRNyI1eRiBds1YGkOHsnmQ3hDtWanSBjX1Zwgqjs5t4Tpj e69A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bkw17dICZlyzCbYHiq9dIhnaZq1I0yg/GLFlXICHkHs=; b=QWLWC78ZJNm3DDou1d3c8MX90DfMvl6ep82sC1QRfgMApLLFY/pNMXw8y/FNuAuUPJ 9kK0wX/l66UJkMOtplihMPM2Cr5ABxDwmih6LYnnahagGQBgWdCzhOuGUNwd/UVzO48W wEnedk5wUSsav79yq2cQKnmy9W2TkwcKEpyMgUZqm0TjlKY/X9dy5GuTcsUvSqfK5pRo tR6Y6STjPVxoB/AEyaq0KMKLr+pouDFTMdBOYjjv5EwFS3lr3ys+ef54/hwLcDxEKIgz FlyIAJ9tBh2v9RK0Ez5lbBVjbkSO3rjeuRF+cKLNbcYL6Vf4qAJux9funtdbf5AOxOGo ZA7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVJ8MLu4kUw+jZ0N9TP+mb/EFJ5B3CO8Tbz6uQsvYdAzD4e54ajGRnMTWDdvuTHcvdeWvGuwQLFcevPqw==
X-Received: by 10.112.169.105 with SMTP id ad9mr1188697lbc.135.1461067371695; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 05:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.213.19 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Apr 2016 05:02:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.41.235]
In-Reply-To: <CAD499eLvW0KFToSHLb4faMHk2c5ad+HAPEwumaq48QaUbh2n2A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <57151C55.30206@gmail.com> <746128222.2295531.1461009032633.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <CAD499eLvW0KFToSHLb4faMHk2c5ad+HAPEwumaq48QaUbh2n2A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 08:02:12 -0400
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1kFgReUFy-RC9ovMUN9LqnBVRCconku4gyqow0sN_0Y9g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feedback for sites currently under active consideration
To: Corinne Cath <corinnecath@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c38c08aee1580530d5410f"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mY74pia1MJ0_6TUbfhbOfgWUgpw>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "mtgvenue@ietf.org" <mtgvenue@ietf.org>, Juliao Braga <juliao@braga.net.br>, "Carlos M. Martinez" <carlos@lacnic.net>, Christian O'Flaherty <oflaherty@isoc.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 12:03:10 -0000
The IETF has a very strong tradition of commenting at length on the topic at hand and hoping either that IETF leadership will spend the time to review the whole thread and extract the salient points from it, or give up in despair. So what you are seeing here is very much the IETF tradition. Asking people to do better probably won't work, although it never hurts to try. I personally see this as a tools problem, more than a communications problem--we need better tools to track the points being made in discussions so that either the people discussing can see that they don't need to make a particular point again, or at least that the people tracking the discussion can see that the point has already been made. On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Corinne Cath <corinnecath@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear all, > > Just a quick question: are you intending on providing feedback to the > IAOC? If so, maybe it makes sense to coordinate a bit in order to prevent a > duplication of entries? Or will it be useful if multiple people point out > the same themes? > > Best, > > Corinne > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:50 PM, <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> >>But >> >> I think these issues should be balanced with the overall benefit >> >> that the IETF World Tour provides. >> >> >> >As I've said repeatedly, I don't think the world tour actually >> >does bring much benefit. I'm very hopeful that some of the >> >South Americans who attended their first IETF meeting because >> >it was held in Buenos Aires will continue to participate (as in: >> >bring in work and participate in ongoing work, and not as in: sit >> >in meetings) but historically that has not been the case. >> >> Just to put some numbers into this conversation, we have 8 people from >> Latin America who have signed up to be a part of the Internet Draft Review >> teams. The first review team to form will likely be the Spanish-speaking >> DNSOP review team. >> >> This is one week after IETF 95 and after 3 days of soliciting review >> teams and basically zero publicity. >> >> I wonder if there has not been more participation in active IETF work >> before from other regions because there was no structured way to start >> participating and language insensitivity. (BTW, there is a new member of >> the Mentoring Team from Latin America, that I met in Buenos Aires who will >> translate the Mentoring emails into Spanish.) >> >> But the effort of the Mentoring Team is standing on the shoulders of >> giants. People such as Carlos Martinez, Christian O'Flaherty, Alvaro >> Retana, Dr. Juliao Braga, and many others who have done such a tremendous >> job of outreach to their community in Latin America. >> >> So, let's do some changing of history. >> >> Nalini >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mtgvenue mailing list >> Mtgvenue@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mtgvenue mailing list > Mtgvenue@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mtgvenue > >
- Interim step on meetings site feedback — for site… The IAOC
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback â fo… Dan Harkins
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Melinda Shore
- RE: Interim step on meetings site feedback — fo… Andrew Allen
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Dan Harkins
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… John Levine
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… nalini.elkins
- RE: [Recentattendees] Interim step on meetings si… fred.clark
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feed… Corinne Cath
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feed… Ted Lemon
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… nalini.elkins
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Christian O'Flaherty
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Ted Lemon
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Melinda Shore
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Vinayak Hegde
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Ted Lemon
- f2f and mailing list participation - a question f… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Christian O'Flaherty
- Re: f2f and mailing list participation - a questi… Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback — fo… Jari Arkko
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Harald Alvestrand
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… thomas nadeau
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… John Levine
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Interim step on meetings site feed… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Melinda Shore
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Stephan Wenger
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Adam Roach
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Ted Lemon
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Adam Roach
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Yoav Nir
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Ross Finlayson
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… lloyd.wood
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… S Moonesamy
- Re: Interim step on meetings site feedback for si… Corinne Cath