Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Thu, 19 April 2018 01:35 UTC
Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BEA126C89; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 18:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=nvYmJPCk; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yitter.info header.b=FbokB3Pp
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KVNCNVYPAFWH; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 18:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.yitter.info (mx4.yitter.info [159.203.56.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D277127286; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 18:35:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E375BECAC; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 01:35:04 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1524101704; bh=tiLjFayiwcj9GNLbkjlTRJoehrT5frtf5eiziBFgsjw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nvYmJPCkoWonipGMLd7gVMLEgwRH9NQmgfDGMHP4M+OJ2KwSxQXeEWLVmC9G+i9Yy Yml+ZOWcQA13y45hi0qh4ZuPMWUCzC9g8DC1+xrNH/FoMeSF9Klb/uUtA1sghT7BfL GFqeRhq6V4DGA1dVRiakHFEKFikOQQm69BZgsdko=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at crankycanuck.ca
Received: from mx4.yitter.info ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx4.yitter.info [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hr5CnasRYrpz; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 01:35:02 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 21:34:57 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yitter.info; s=default; t=1524101702; bh=tiLjFayiwcj9GNLbkjlTRJoehrT5frtf5eiziBFgsjw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FbokB3PpsukS4toTb4vGvZQSyBpo994CpBVL53P1HRSrQ/+mNrsmxen1tOtPXL3JO 31yCklrA32NVkHnCEImjLzTDJcNV6BGBCkodq+Li1lsO1QQIwpqGHqd0h+WgnUNtSp Yos5SWaQXf/zyii34KhKmL2oS9Uegr/dofNM71OQ=
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Cc: mtgvenue@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> (High level guidance for the meeting policy of the IETF) to Best Current Practice
Message-ID: <20180419013457.fq4ruqj7p4lfwxb4@mx4.yitter.info>
References: <152295916074.25912.932711807710247299.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <152295916074.25912.932711807710247299.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mcl-t2HDJDm8PlZmVzYoqnuQGrY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 01:35:37 -0000
Dear IESG, On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:12:40PM -0700, The IESG wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from the Meeting Venue WG (mtgvenue) to > consider the following document: - 'High level guidance for the meeting > policy of the IETF' > <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-04.txt> as Best Current Practice In a recent discussion, the IAOC came to realise that the documents draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process and draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy may be in some tension. One of them requires the IASA to balance meeting venues over time, and the other has requirements that a meeting must meet. One possible difficulty that arises from the combination is if one region turns out to be vastly more expensive than others. In that case, some criteria for each venue may not be met in one region. The result might also be financially ruinous for the IETF in general. The current IAOC interprets the drafts such that any of the criteria except those in section 3.1 of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-iaoc-venue-selection-process may be traded against any other, over several years if need be, in order to meet the geographic distribution policy described in draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy. Assuming the documents are published as they are currently written, we will use that interpretation as governing IASA implementation decisions. It is worth noting that, among the criteria that could be traded are those of affordability. If that is not the interpretation of the IETF community, then some clarification is needed to the text. Best regards, Andrew Sullivan for the IAOC -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… Russ Housley
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… Eric Rescorla
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… Richard Barnes
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Ted Lemon
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… Lou Berger
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: 1-1-1 or whateverm was … John Levine
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Cullen Jennings
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Lou Berger
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Ted Lemon
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Adam Roach
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: 1-1-1 or whateverm was … Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Melinda Shore
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… tom p.
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… Lou Berger
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… John Levine
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Fred Baker
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Russ Housley
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Randy Bush
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Lloyd Wood
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Suresh Krishnan
- Venue definition and distribution comments summar… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: Venue definition and distribution comments su… Lloyd Wood
- Re: [Mtgvenue] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-me… Russ Housley
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-polic… Alissa Cooper