IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 17 July 2015 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7951A0270 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 07:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQ2qr7PRP0xp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 07:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.bortzmeyer.org (aetius.bortzmeyer.org [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:41:216:3eff:fece:1902]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A92D61A1B2B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 07:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.bortzmeyer.org (Postfix, from userid 10) id 4BA873BC02; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:48:06 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.sources.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CE7BC190A80; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:46:37 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:46:37 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld-00.txt> (The .onion Special-Use Domain Name) to Proposed Standard
Message-ID: <20150717144637.GB18129@sources.org>
References: <20150714192438.1138.96059.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKr6gn0KTpdsbG67aUvnvSt833C+1kH8tB1PEZoksq6R+9FPNw@mail.gmail.com> <91B3FDB8-C46E-4B97-ADA7-900794C0237D@frobbit.se> <154CECB0C21A02BC78224D78@JcK-HP8200.jck.com> <BBA233B3-789D-4AAD-82B3-41C995E11D8E@frobbit.se> <CA+9kkMBGAfKhFpiPV8L+cz2gXu8ccD8YmfgJ_PXHqDRaknjO-Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMBGAfKhFpiPV8L+cz2gXu8ccD8YmfgJ_PXHqDRaknjO-Q@mail.gmail.com>
X-Transport: UUCP rules
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 8.1
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/md5Dd6HI3RXDpGcWEsdPGA4oXfQ>
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>, Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:48:47 -0000

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:56:27AM -0700,
 Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> wrote 
 a message of 331 lines which said:

> there are lots of other ways to partition the namespace.
> pseudo-TLDs are not required; they look convenient because they hide
> the costs.

I'm sure there are but, scratching my head, I don't immediately
remember one. It would be great to have an Internet-Draft describing
the ways to have identifiers for Joe Developer's new naming scheme,
with their pros and cons.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email