RE: BitTorrentvs MBONE
"Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com> Fri, 16 September 2005 04:35 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EG7wj-00026b-CG; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:35:33 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EG7wh-00026D-8K for ietf@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:35:31 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA09814 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:35:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from colibri.verisign.com ([65.205.251.74]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EG81c-0000bK-Ft for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:40:37 -0400
Received: from MOU1WNEXCN03.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (mailer6.verisign.com [65.205.251.33]) by colibri.verisign.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8G4ZOSO014380; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:35:24 -0700
Received: from MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([10.25.13.157]) by MOU1WNEXCN03.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:35:23 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 21:35:23 -0700
Message-ID: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD375A2B48@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
Thread-Topic: BitTorrentvs MBONE
Thread-Index: AcW6b1ed3o/M5aJ7SHGYlJtKbMbgZgACBV6Q
From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
To: John Kristoff <jtk@northwestern.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Sep 2005 04:35:23.0913 (UTC) FILETIME=[0DBB0790:01C5BA78]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 798b2e660f1819ae38035ac1d8d5e3ab
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc:
Subject: RE: BitTorrentvs MBONE
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
> Behalf Of John Kristoff > What is interesting is that these numbers haven't moved all > that much over the past few years. Multicast deployment has > peaked, but one might consider 10% (using address coverage as > one measure) to be pretty widely deployed. Does MBONE work through any NAT box on the planet? What proportion of the IP addresses are NAT-ed? I can't imagine bothering to download a program if there is less than a 10% chance it will work for me. A communication program by definition needs two sites so the probability of it working is less than 1%. And for multicast to be an advantage there has to be at least 3 people so we are down to 0.1% probability of working. Take it to the woodshed. _______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
- RE: BitTorrentvs MBONE Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: BitTorrentvs MBONE Tim Bray
- Re: BitTorrentvs MBONE John Kristoff
- RE: BitTorrentvs MBONE Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: BitTorrentvs MBONE Pekka Savola