IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Sun, 04 April 2021 08:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09743A1D95 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 01:49:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gJ3Gq3NXbxpT for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 01:49:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F1E63A1D94 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Apr 2021 01:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 24662 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2021 08:26:49 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 4 Apr 2021 08:26:49 -0000
Subject: Re: A contribution to ongoing terminology work
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <859352252.4167919.1617264911078.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <859352252.4167919.1617264911078@mail.yahoo.com> <85575541-C896-4530-B028-C0DF9BA3EA8B@ietf.org> <411426886.24320.1617306016731@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com> <20210401195735.GA3828@localhost> <20210402032059.GD79563@kduck.mit.edu> <1e4feea2-2c81-b31a-04e3-d4c9a4adbaf7@lounge.org> <20210402163230.GH79563@kduck.mit.edu> <4c82de79-1e40-2eed-909b-8a288284393d@lounge.org> <439a33c9-5791-4c90-76a3-54aab828a37d@network-heretics.com> <5C955F3B-2EE7-43DD-85BA-DA1C1CF353F1@tzi.org> <7b3ba302-ec36-eb8d-7461-861a0b6651ac@network-heretics.com> <0dca7a0d-d51e-4c67-cc96-a44de0141480@gmail.com>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <ff5a5598-7c48-d733-c7cf-bdbb8c05a831@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 17:49:25 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <0dca7a0d-d51e-4c67-cc96-a44de0141480@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mgoWhD18G7j5wZD_pO5g07KFljI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Apr 2021 08:49:35 -0000

Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> Indeed. Judging "intent" is very difficult except in the most
> egregious cases. It's much easier to judge offensiveness: if a
> reasonable number of people are offended, it's offensive, whatever
> the intent.

OK. So, as reasonable number of people are offended by IESG,
IESG must be deleted, only after which, we can restore
constructive discussions.

 > FWIW, I found the "Les White" drafts pretty offensive,
 > and unprofessional, even if I could discern a satirical aspect.

I'm not sure, but, if you mean IESG unprofessional, I fully
agree with you. It is also impolite.

						Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email