IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Old Errata

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Mon, 12 September 2016 11:40 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A4E12B24E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 04:40:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P7ag0hcZZB_b for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 04:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoba.ie (unknown [92.51.243.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D671712B20D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 04:40:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [134.226.36.93] (bilbo.dsg.cs.tcd.ie [134.226.36.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hoba.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1200E0040; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:40:11 +0100 (IST)
Subject: Re: Old Errata
To: Loa Andersson <bronze-dragon@hotmail.co.uk>
References: <8536B7D1-FBE7-403F-B635-7B5794C5D8BA@gmail.com> <7a1ba395-3075-4d1a-d210-75218062b054@pi.nu> <e0b3b824-d3fd-866b-dc6a-bec2ac8aa947@cs.tcd.ie> <BLU436-SMTP42CEDCCA4EFC69102A3D7A0FF0@phx.gbl>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <d02ee341-59c8-0018-a044-837dcd633089@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 12:40:11 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BLU436-SMTP42CEDCCA4EFC69102A3D7A0FF0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms010606050101020201010101"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mlGL4foym0nICCB2DzL2oG-ixKI>
Cc: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 11:40:18 -0000


On 12/09/16 12:23, Loa Andersson wrote:
> Stephen,
> 
> Errata that does not attract interest could do so for many reasons. I
> think we at least should make up our mind if they should be rejected.
> If they are not they at least should be held for a future bis.

That is reasonable, assuming "we" is the set of folks reading this
thread.

S.

> 
> /Loa
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
>> On 12 sep. 2016, at 12:15, Stephen Farrell
>> <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 12/09/16 10:56, Loa Andersson wrote:
>>> 
>>> The ADs might have to point to someone to resolve the (oldest)
>>> errata. Or errata that belong to closed wg's.
>> 
>> FWIW, for my WGs, I follow the practice of handling any errata for
>> which someone shows interest. So if there're any that need to be
>> processed, then please ping me, and/or a relevant mailing list and
>> I'll take action. If, OTOH, nobody is interested, then that is also
>> true of me:-)
>> 
>> While other ADs may be more proactive than me, I think it's true
>> that if pinged, ADs will generally take action.
>> 
>> Cheers, S.
>> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email