IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Specific Questions about Registration details for IETF 108

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 04 June 2020 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C36A3A003B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 07:30:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mbh3pIoXT0aO for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 07:30:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0843F3A0927 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2020 07:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id p18so4890071eds.7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 07:30:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=KhBE9XGolZr76Bxh3YP2VYH4VoLngzVzcO5SjAdXMfE=; b=JJIdVwOA62hZIRq2/1eJ/1IoklszDorVWYSgyooEumGosJhjIqB1PwytkGanHf68cy 1xVQmJMjxhoS5p4TYCeLJnXZSOM1hjw+gFGkTebIuEW0KGohgsAiP6B9joeBDv1xc1pP +EyPTJ+a3CYA+q40oos9bw04EAhgjc92tfWkw4H2bzhrZvDX0UKIfjuH1NhJOhZHONwU n6Xp+kzSwo2BRso6PwEmlcY5CnxQDkaw7tDfmy8KPOxcHakNGGoDSbBZrZcN9fP6NR08 KSsdJXjbv73vL50/1M1rCCfs5tlr60Q/YOIh3l6VAaDbW7vw8qHz/E7rf9PU7GhzuGVP 0xUw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=KhBE9XGolZr76Bxh3YP2VYH4VoLngzVzcO5SjAdXMfE=; b=kbLSAMJCerqCCKIETjU9LjkmCJCUDwyZthRO6dG3Q2DoAF1vtLtysksrK5t+IOs0KV gbDavfHcf0GA8R1z11YyKUCcTga5dlBttbCmFM9+nQAvpjf5Wzux+omyguMnSIcd+4t5 LyMPA5cCQbSpTP/gmO/LrPHR9bgq4Z9aZ1CmpqPYdRX175j+72PCpc9GCajr8dN5FKNR mt3hFgYdFAQidwCWi2B+ZzcyzvfPdDv/1MFppPS/IAe8zBo0nH5Rsu9+tZOas8rsdWUJ BOpUEvRfZzA8cPQ6qXDeQ9wxZ+lh1bCDd0BjeQexLccbMsa0GQpGqQgYVZzMB1L61Y8a uxZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531qnhJOBk+8L2B0ga4FNsxWGarX9sdOSMXnrQM3/PZKiQhNRfzR T+CXhHHha7/tETuSKiB9K5iUgW53tEdMNU/WVmURiQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwOcyiNLYyjJ49lTGzlDBN1VN/ROx4zmWh/lv+xrVdqJmEuPvYc56KyEEid8oNvm1jj6sUGZatp+vEV60eIRF8=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:c017:: with SMTP id r23mr4835821edb.120.1591281005541; Thu, 04 Jun 2020 07:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <159062833754.6110.5826748635235943562@ietfa.amsl.com> <3B19A920-9D33-4E3D-8B8B-8134A5E55316@gmail.com> <86D7C39D-9778-4408-B7CA-CB74E9572B1B@ietf.org> <CABmDk8k4+nf9CyMRVNQkY03T8w4=e-woY4Vxau2tLtz=g72tFw@mail.gmail.com> <D7B0245A-B500-43CC-89FF-111C14976414@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <D7B0245A-B500-43CC-89FF-111C14976414@gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 16:29:53 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMH2rq6gJj_VSfTU8O1zN2C+=uFJBrD2Aqr65Ergy9ujBQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Specific Questions about Registration details for IETF 108
To: Tim Chown <tjc.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000012d3a605a742fb5e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mmAtPmktezuk9dAqX436QRyxryM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2020 14:30:13 -0000

Shouldn't virtual IETF have virtual T-Shirts ? Or if real thing like
mascot  is needed a 3D printer project file such that those who want it can
print it locally.

R.

On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 2:37 PM Tim Chown <tjc.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> > On 3 Jun 2020, at 20:37, Mary B <mary.h.barnes@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > A simple answer to the t-shirt issue is that t-shirts will be only be
> available if you register by a certain date (FCFS) - that's the best
> forcing function with this group AFAICT since the cookie count isn't
> impacted.
> >
> > Otherwise, I don't see the point in deadlines either.
>
> I agree.
>
> If t-shirts are an issue, add $20 for those who want one, or whatever the
> actual cost is with postage and handling time, and keep the costs down.
>
> Tim
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email