Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis

"Roni Even" <> Tue, 24 May 2016 07:12 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D445412DC7C; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FwHXhxOOVjdP; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:12:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D95812B076; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id z87so11467670wmh.0; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:12:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:thread-index :content-language; bh=LSvoROgswzmdGDCDjxMrXO3N+FLIRiq/nOf5ED1djrU=; b=srwSsLc4Av+MpFqxt4gagjEu7vTjY5tj3zVKV6XGI50sMBwGvFe81qf94hwhUneQ3R Jl0mCz7ZVJoaCbmSSwyFZMRTs/efCrReRZaC74UIeTSyprASA3RAcQRxYhsJueAoCTeG WC3VGLdzk46uY6H7E+sf8eWU5vXW2MN1NY2LAGOvW1JoxNAW5HYKdcB/11NMAurRpr6W BrBq2t3LRde2n3i66uypYNuqDgfIIW1fnzh9gMr7GM4FKzu69lJCS5LnIgyFDS11eFp1 Dqr6+b9+aicpdL+i+2IPXWhAa0kl3FLahSaam6cO7DqBu+dkUaaR3lmD9bN9T1E8TBaZ xaGg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :thread-index:content-language; bh=LSvoROgswzmdGDCDjxMrXO3N+FLIRiq/nOf5ED1djrU=; b=K0UVIOGOFiS+M+C1eftGmc5UXYt7kAdKOJaFRgMsIUrlfbXmfNJCqe9F/GsYfQIxTP l+f+WwlbSKuRwxY3B1MGcZcCBH0got3dmozeMcds8Ve+K1S8aWiObF4sZSXeMmucWI+Z bqUt1KhlRTzelhemZYz+r8ffN3JSRmash2DWrzMn8G4XAK5s8v5P5IYcV8vLIqs4wnja yPSsNBYPCk8d9jyLyrwXYNoQaROZ21vK7AVt/gdBsoXjn7LOn0UBrQXpbKxVuutdh1Uc RIjhPTzf2ihuq8bxPX7dLt67Vxf5sFNqgT9uwbrldZ1w6rDn1/jI6v5qP9gU1F2uxLkB pSUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKADhFOkP8047Q7GbIb8UFnnqoln5PezABsYHRNKvE/TmteurQMnNfcrnDtwVDVPw==
X-Received: by with SMTP id m8mr2694631wjq.98.1464073936602; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:12:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RoniPC ( []) by with ESMTPSA id f11sm17616029wmf.22.2016. (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 May 2016 00:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Roni Even" <>
To: <>, <>
Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis
Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 10:11:20 +0300
Message-ID: <007601d1b58b$79f3afb0$6ddb0f10$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0077_01D1B5A4.9F426E50"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdG1i29cinWgaqQ9RTKvEueSLkcndA==
Content-Language: he
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 07:12:21 -0000


Sorry for the late feedback


I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you
may receive.

Document:  draft-leiba-cotton-iana-5226bis-12

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2016-5-24

IETF LC End Date: 2016-5-17

IESG Telechat date: 


Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a BCP  RFC.



Major issues:


Minor issues:


I am wondering about the lack of normative language for example in section

   "When reviewing a document that asks IANA to create a new registry or
change a registration policy to any policy more stringent than Expert Review
or Specification Required, the IESG should ask for justification to ensure
that more relaxed policies have been considered and that the strict policy
is the right one."

Is the "should" normative here? 

 Nits/editorial comments: