Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy
David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com> Sun, 22 July 2012 21:00 UTC
Return-Path: <dwm@xpasc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014FE21F8587 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.985
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.985 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-3.386, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OyPYRRBBEWqw for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c2w3p-2.abacamail.com (c2w3p-2.abacamail.com [209.133.53.32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E2D621F854B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:00:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xpasc.com (unknown [68.164.244.188]) by c2w3p-2.abacamail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E8F40A22 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:01:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from egate.xpasc.com (egate.xpasc.com [10.1.2.49]) by xpasc.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q6ML1h7X005100 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:01:43 -0700
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 14:01:43 -0700
From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207221654200.31418@joyce.lan>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1207221359180.5034@egate.xpasc.com>
References: <CAJNg7VKqbdXeFXCe6iBRPe=X89q4NuSVcgvmc+C=t0826HRwiA@mail.gmail.com> <20120722153118.60473.qmail@joyce.lan> <CAJNg7VK9OJNdtBb4+F3ZepvgpwuXQ_30ung_Y91m--g1a+CpfA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207221550590.17748@joyce.lan> <06CAE00A-F7AF-4D6C-ACE4-0D8399C13F44@sobco.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207221642080.31418@joyce.lan> <3B377A30-123B-4772-AAB8-FAA535FDD0BE@sobco.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207221654200.31418@joyce.lan>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-AV-Type: clean
X-AV-Accuracy: exact
X-Milter-Version: master.52-geef5514
X-CLX-ID: a120AD3GD1et1vr-6M1401i
X-CLX-Spam: false
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:00:42 -0000
Yeah, with what the lawyers in the room are getting per hour, there is no reason to volunteer as an expert wittness. Ever. Even if you are there on behalf of the IETF, if the IETF prevails, they can only recover costs they incurred and if they don't, make a donation. On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, John R Levine wrote: > > I did not do them any favor - I did the IETF a favor (as the then ISOC VP > > for Standards) > > Really, if you didn't make the opposing party pay for your time, you did them > a favor. It's absolutely expected to pay hostile witnesses for their depo > time. (If nobody mentioned it, why would they offer to pay if you were willing > to do it for free?) > > If it happens again, pick the highest rate you think you're worth and double > it. If you want, donate the money to the IETF trust and encourage them to use > it for better cookies. > > R's, > John >
- Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy IETF Administrative Director
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Warren Kumari
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Richard L. Barnes
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Scott Brim
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Bradner, Scott
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Richard L. Barnes
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy John C Klensin
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Yoav Nir
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy John Levine
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Dave Crocker
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Bob Hinden
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Marshall Eubanks
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Jiankang Yao
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Andrew G. Malis
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Leif Johansson
- RE: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy John Levine
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Carsten Bormann
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy John R Levine
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy John R Levine
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy John R Levine
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy David Morris
- RE: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Richard Shockey
- RE: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Richard Shockey
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Scott O Bradner
- Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Scott O Bradner
- Re: Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy Samuel Weiler