Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with a mailing list?
"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 02 May 2014 21:28 UTC
Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002801A093A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 14:28:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.152
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uV6gfVPRTzHf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 May 2014 14:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D621A0929 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 May 2014 14:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1137; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1399066092; x=1400275692; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=iwr29btai2LVgXaoFOiKRMdR1+04LUSvTJfhWL/zZ1k=; b=J33UuEzoEB6F1rGDTI27EPHcU6k6taSbFxoo+f4skXNhMNXlgR6PyaDg /YaOcK6pMQOc88WvS5+SiAXI49HcuJ9q3rD6J7nifK9RYPVLApHI0ROyM 09Qg1bE2hXeP7/erhtn88p2HaZZsOKZkAxBaqmdECGeOteA/7ohA3Ersk U=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAIIMZFOtJV2c/2dsb2JhbABZgwaBJ8RNgREWdIIlAQEBAwFuCwULAgEIRjIlAgQOBQ6IKwjKTxeOUgeDJIEVAQORHoE5hlmSb4M0gi8
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,974,1389744000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="322038764"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 02 May 2014 21:28:12 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com [173.36.12.75]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s42LSBAl013530 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 2 May 2014 21:28:11 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.100]) by xhc-aln-x01.cisco.com ([173.36.12.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 2 May 2014 16:28:11 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with a mailing list?
Thread-Topic: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with a mailing list?
Thread-Index: AQHPZktylLJhKDiyUUiuRF0rJPpjepsuIg6A
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 21:28:11 +0000
Message-ID: <E32E56A1-F404-489B-96F5-FCF335BFD57A@cisco.com>
References: <20140502211317.81216.qmail@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20140502211317.81216.qmail@joyce.lan>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.118]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_37A76879-CEDC-41B4-92A0-DBD1A5393AF6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mtNJs_9A5VWCUPRGRVJdd6_U0Cs
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 21:28:16 -0000
On May 2, 2014, at 2:13 PM, John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote: > We've been running that experiment for at least a year. Surprise! Good to hear. Obviously not the area I’m looking at hardest. If we’re having the level of problems that seem to be being reported in this thread, it would appear that we haven’t learned much from the experiment. I take it that the draft Doug Otis mentions is part of the mitigation discussion.
- Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment with a … Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment wit… Christopher Morrow
- Re: Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment wit… Douglas Otis
- Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with… John Levine
- Re: Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment wit… Dave Crocker
- Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with… John R Levine
- Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with… Douglas Otis
- Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with… John R Levine
- Re: Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment wit… Hector Santos
- Re: Suggestion: can we test DMARC deployment with… Theodore Ts'o
- Re: Suggestion: can we test DEMARC deployment wit… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC d… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC d… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC d… Miles Fidelman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC d… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC d… Dave Crocker
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC d… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC d… Douglas Otis
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC d… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC d… ned+ietf
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC d… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC d… Hector Santos
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC d… John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] Suggestion: can we test DEMARC d… Doyle, John