Re: IETF 97 in Seoul, South Korea!

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 16 December 2014 18:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6621E1A700F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:42:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ydH5cvOKxmaI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:42:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 025F01ACD93 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 10:42:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E0A2002A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:46:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 9A0D2637F5; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:42:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8376763740 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:42:12 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF 97 in Seoul, South Korea!
In-Reply-To: <20141216142508.2747.81900.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <20141216142508.2747.81900.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:42:12 -0500
Message-ID: <1648.1418755332@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/mvKesmR-DZgTsDnt4kpVsO-ywXs
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 18:42:15 -0000

IETF Administrative Director <iad@ietf.org> wrote:
    > 2016 95 Buenos Aires 3 - 8 April TBD
    >      96 Berlin 17 - 22 July Juniper
    >      97 Seoul 13 - 18 Nov TBD

I did a quick grep/count and the last time we had three meetings in a row not
in North America was.  

   March 27 - April 1, 2011; Prague, Czech Republic; Hosted by CZ.NIC
   November 7-12, 2010; Beijing, China; Hosted by Tsinghua University
   July 25-30, 2010; Maastricht, Netherlands; Hosted by SIDN

We have never had all meetings in a calendar year be "in-the-rest-of-the-world"
So I regard this as progress.  
{Should we start a betting pool on what the geo-IP for each meeting will
say?}

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-