IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Ombudsteam remedies and confidentiality

S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> Wed, 28 August 2024 07:12 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@elandsys.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D5AC15108C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=elandsys.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tSICDhq4kcb1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1509C151095 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:12:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from DESKTOP-K6V9C2L.elandsys.com ([207.242.50.40]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPSA id 47S7CDwW019617 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=elandsys.com; s=mail; t=1724829167; x=1724915567; i=@elandsys.com; bh=Ia9dSt2TRyKx84Zj7V67+qvet9OXsKJbDjDh3hlpodw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=N1TEqxpTJUdOlIgO8+0Z5MLIpYJygyWpYg5JGloIGlWu7z8kEm3SREtWO0JZ+yvMd bMVJ5ugsaxo9rwhCPx5N9FSnaNLqdcERwcpcZgZvGRX+i+odW2n4BeW1/gS/EIwojs HLJBesEkcSDHDkCdBRV9knZILs4/cN70d/2LnD9I=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20240827230334.0b225800@elandnews.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2024 00:03:03 -0700
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>
Subject: Re: Ombudsteam remedies and confidentiality
In-Reply-To: <DC9EEB51-039C-4301-BA98-99BDB1DC4576@episteme.net>
References: <DC9EEB51-039C-4301-BA98-99BDB1DC4576@episteme.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID-Hash: UVIDGJUCDXCXW6KTH6H2W76ZAPN5SDTM
X-Message-ID-Hash: UVIDGJUCDXCXW6KTH6H2W76ZAPN5SDTM
X-MailFrom: sm@elandsys.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ietf.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF-Discussion. This is the most general IETF mailing list, intended for discussion of technical, procedural, operational, and other topics for which no dedicated mailing lists exist." <ietf.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/n2yRDEX8Lz2kbEXTOncKItLbMvk>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ietf-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ietf-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-leave@ietf.org>

Hello,

RFC 7776 (Section 4.1) stated that: "These [operating] practices must 
be discussed with the IESG and published in a publicly visible place 
(such as on the IETF web site).  Discussion with the IETF community 
is encouraged and, ..."

RFC 7776 was published in 2016.

   (a) The operating practices have not been published up to this day.

   (b) There wasn't any discussion with the IETF community.

Would it be possible to do something about (a) and (b)?

Regards,
S. Moonesamy

v2.37.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status