Re: not really pgp signing in van

Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Tue, 10 September 2013 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <tytso@thunk.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A882711E81DB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5shsvinLDOyi for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:15:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from imap.thunk.org (imap.thunk.org [IPv6:2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:fe96:be03]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90FA11E8196 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:15:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from root (helo=closure.thunk.org) by imap.thunk.org with local-esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <tytso@thunk.org>) id 1VJWDN-00069y-Aa; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 22:15:17 +0000
Received: by closure.thunk.org (Postfix, from userid 15806) id 99E6F580876; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:15:16 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=thunk.org; s=mail; t=1378851316; bh=4OFfakAB1VWHPnxSAGH/2ttBMlcL9IYJfh2RfCAGgTo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Red18aCFF/RMgC6V07/ipqbmvL0LeXQ50RMM1YbHfqzhUf0pKojIBzqm9tc3dY/cD 7xvyqb1or8adiBgA3Sifn7ZWWlteDRNLGWYIJOJCRiq2vFuhbh6yzkR/j9gDIlC2Y/ JwLxsoktky5KqvW6Iv2YJ4SM82B/33JE6ElD1wOo=
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 18:15:16 -0400
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Subject: Re: not really pgp signing in van
Message-ID: <20130910221516.GB11063@thunk.org>
References: <20130910010719.33978.qmail@joyce.lan> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077527E234@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309092125360.34090@joyce.lan> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B63077527E488@mbx-01.win.nominum.com> <CAMm+LwhZ9OKesZW+kFct5Gps6_JBzcNUUBQ-y5J21zMcxmL6EQ@mail.gmail.com> <241D1DD6-C096-49D6-A05B-33638846BF15@nominum.com> <CAMm+LwhhUzDX=AaJXSCkqJofHQ9ZiN11GmCw-reO0OPmNC4fyA@mail.gmail.com> <E2ECE63C-D8E4-4A5A-BEA3-295C027D0E71@nominum.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309101745410.46654@joyce.lan>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1309101745410.46654@joyce.lan>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Cc: "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 22:15:19 -0000

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 05:47:55PM -0400, John R Levine wrote:
> 
> I think we're entering the tinfoil zone here.  Comodo is one of the
> largest CAs around, with their entire income depending on people
> paying them to sign web and code certs because they are seen as
> trustworthy.

You might want to watch first half of Moxie Marlinspike's presentation
at Black Hat 2011, "SSL And The Future Of Authenticity".  It's not
entirely clear to me that his proposed solution is the correct one,
but his problem statement of why CA's can't be trusted to do a good
job can be found here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Wl2FW2TcA

> How likely is it that they would risk their reputation and hence
> their entire business by screwing around with free promo S/MIME
> certs?

Watch the video; note that removing Comodo from the list of acceptable
CA's is really not practical, so there really is no incentive for them
to do a good job.

				- Ted