Re: [IAOC] Badges and blue sheets

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Tue, 16 November 2010 17:45 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF893A6D91 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:45:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JmCCS2Nja2w9 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:45:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A10C3A6DDF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:45:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so283167pzk.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:46:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bCpGT3TJIKLe9nGEX4ZDMsxMxU3JRc8dV6vIItZz0po=; b=pia6ox7IbVL6xKG+MJSAnKm6G7jX26SWHk1nGNn1egUkj++ZGSlvx0pY3z04Dm2nc2 s4zZulo2ARPSKLBLycI+hrSX0uu2zQLJ6IxsQgBNMSnxbNHYH6JPIqLcx5Oo05/sOEhi lH6YXGkcHxKr/qXT0JoEdROcbg+nU/ZF6/WjE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=onVoRx2KLpRLaSn/fYYdrs7fntbZu0zsQMhWJBe8d9YN5WEYZtPUlhxqZEl3imFSG8 8D+QlSjoeoy0uUTTTpyJYNVW60WAmfzFYDBTGcYL6/EAfkzGmD+n9GlMoCG0PUG1WOqY i/Kp9sKtrusWi5HHTkImZT1XC7kRkPPgqwatI=
Received: by 10.229.245.213 with SMTP id lv21mr6365355qcb.293.1289929597616; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:46:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from che-vpn-cluster-1-405.cisco.com (198-135-0-233.cisco.com [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id mz11sm898780qcb.27.2010.11.16.09.46.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:46:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4CE2C379.20704@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 12:46:33 -0500
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@shinkuro.com>
Subject: Re: [IAOC] Badges and blue sheets
References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1011160736090.43323@hiroshima.bogus.com> <C9087492.23A8AF%jordi.palet@consulintel.es> <20101116165951.GP1389@shinkuro.com>
In-Reply-To: <20101116165951.GP1389@shinkuro.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:45:55 -0000

On 11/16/2010 11:59 CST, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 05:49:06PM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>> We need a consistent policy.
> 
> I think the idea that we need a giant rule-book of policies, carefully
> gone over by everyone to ensure perfect consistency among the rules
> applying to different classes of people (whose situations we will
> artificially make "the same" in order that the comparison function
> works, in some giant new volunteer-run form of Ontario's failed pay
> equity system) is the sort of beguiling fantasy that destroys formerly
> agile, loose organizations like the IETF.  We do not need a consistent
> policy.  What we need, I say, is no policy at all except, "The
> people handling the money shall use good judgement, and we'll get to
> audit the books afterwards."
> 
> A
> 

Right, focus on process not procedures.