Re: Enough is Enough.

Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 20 October 2020 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E00A3A1220 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:46:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3vX0sMOCV_TC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C8173A121F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id f10so2482914otb.6 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:46:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=O12TcHCkhFjFeTwtKAyzVstqtHIDVZW4RUYpRcFAKNs=; b=CYyBRNuJlIZVfSJG04Jns0r7k++d1BatRnmgiZidnRZAdaAw4gBU80LK2BDG2lyujx Eenqlao7+ava8i232n3s4TJqV7x6BZPExyPjg/fTfrf/3IfSKmywbEiCdmXoiy+ihcDT pKODVh9SuUklEXxtiamzBLr6y522AHljBxphzEPIGTPmPKuGJX06wCKJ/Ay8sS0qmbMZ abDg1JbGMuRZUDHXkatEQR+400KNFplT3Du9Y4jqIRzPoiOXCVpJCRuR343XcN6XeDBv tq+0h2VRVnAWPkcc6PyZyVhH8e646Ov9l+HHWd6+zGvsL7ycBlQIe6/3CjEJ9bjpzbDU 31uA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=O12TcHCkhFjFeTwtKAyzVstqtHIDVZW4RUYpRcFAKNs=; b=Vi8SDz0cO1d8PxZmtZoHxqQi/lSp14rXg2+bPaLwPNkKc/Keq4UukIFgED5pX2TfCI azfBAQ4DahO2MQhLyijN1I1999S3w1Dxic+GIYFZXWBZovD6LjLLC5U/6BIZTnJ8+eSx /8qDawybqVVTreB/Pn8/9wJ2hJWMkPmH1f7EyVbiGlrCtZtFGoO9NsTHh38pjBMiarcq hCRV7CCenOefL25ryIzgIOF7/dvRFnctYG3oOSy+eU9N4Ro4fyWKcvU3j77YWLzZVRjY wME2MGXHiUC6G5u0DS9tYh5lGemcIhlBrQMfuUTz4tnINZE3S2EhTAw9YTwXRUxDh0c9 Aopw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5331UOzYD1qqv/Vmos0PLLzq71stWiG3+z+B11XsmvDdWhW0XJxU /qhVS36s+ajqif0kAxLasrjr7imXZ1tTDg4FZiY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxLsFAB+d8inNEww20Fg1YzzvpPkTqQuV1tmxTTQ6D3ULtm8in+hEf/ZthSGNZQVq12YbTTOp4WoFW3J8y9E3E=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3081:: with SMTP id f1mr2341166ots.269.1603215995300; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <VI1P194MB02851798998F8B7CAE17EBEBAE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB02851798998F8B7CAE17EBEBAE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
From: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:46:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+9kkMCf=FgXweAYe3jBrmU-w2CRc33Gc4Q-_5dWmnyDzfFwbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Enough is Enough.
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000e5ee5405b21dcf78"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/nD2PG3PBHevGxdR_VeZ7EYZJJbU>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:46:37 -0000

Hi Khaled,

There are a large number of repositories which mirror the internet-drafts;
some of those are public and some are within organizations. If your intent
is to withdraw the work from the IETF, the most effective way forward might
be to publish a new version of each draft, noting that the work is not
being pursued within the IETF any more.  That will supersede any previous
versions and clearly signal your intent.  That also gives you a chance to
publish where you will discuss the work, if you will still be carrying on
conversations about the proposals.

regards,

Ted Hardie

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 10:01 AM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
wrote:

> Dear IETFers,
>
>
>
> I hope this is my last e-mail with the IETF and I’m not feeling coward to
> repeat my first request regarding deleting my drafts from the IETF
> repository.
>
>
>
> Can anyone tell me whom is the responsible person for deleting drafts from
> the IETF?
>
>
>
> P.S. I don’t want to find any BCP or whatever that mention that the
> original author of the draft has not the right to ask for deleting his
> drafts as this doesn’t make any sense.
>
>
>
> I wish you good luck after the deletion and the ideas not being used by
> the IETF as they have no benefits as many claims.
>
>
>
> Sorry for any disturbance.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Khaled Omar
>
>
>
>