IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF privacy policy - update

John C Klensin <john@jck.com> Mon, 05 July 2010 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <john@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810413A63D3 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 13:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8KrDkTqxNpas for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 13:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bs.jck.com (ns.jck.com [209.187.148.211]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B4128C0E0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Jul 2010 13:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by bs.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1OVrur-000LpF-Rp; Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:05:22 -0400
Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 16:05:21 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john@jck.com>
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@americafree.tv>, dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: IETF privacy policy - update
Message-ID: <F8E71CB57F57CFE0CC44DD62@[192.168.1.128]>
In-Reply-To: <4B42EB41-0502-4D51-8B43-A3EC30B58643@americafree.tv>
References: <7022DEA1-7FC0-4D77-88CE-FA3788720B43@cdt.org> <4C322170.9040903@dcrocker.net> <4B42EB41-0502-4D51-8B43-A3EC30B58643@americafree.tv>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 08:01:12 -0700
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 20:05:28 -0000

this makes sense to me, fwiw.

   john


--On Monday, July 05, 2010 2:28 PM -0400 Marshall Eubanks
<tme@americafree.tv> wrote:

> <wearing no hats>
>...
> I assume (for I do not know) that people are worried about
> time involved in bringing a new RFC to publication.
> 
> I don't see why this couldn't be divided in the way that the
> Trust Legal Provisions have been :
> 
> - a RFC to set the _goals_ and basic framework of the privacy
> policy, which might change something like every 5 years (or
> less often if we are lucky) and
> 
> - an IAOC document for the actual privacy policy itself, which
> could be changed very quickly if (say) lawyers started beating
> down the doors.
> 
> Regards
> Marshall
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Please clarify.
>> 
>> Thanks.
>> 
>> d/
>> 
>> ps. I, too, like the idea of having the policy.  I'm only
>> asking   about its form.
>> 
>> -- 
>> 
>>  Dave Crocker
>>  Brandenburg InternetWorking
>>  bbiw.net
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ietf mailing list
>> Ietf@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email