Re: spam on the webdav list
Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Thu, 20 August 2020 14:02 UTC
Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395163A0B0C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 07:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.949, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qzjkp4AEveH9 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 07:02:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 110A93A0C5F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 07:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 07KE21NY092743 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:02:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1597932123; bh=1BwrRwU/HAnTIhM1cpfIzYfW217xTLhilz97VfCLM4A=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=A+uD0Fmaik4SoOAgUYkxuw4JYuOYXB9wpIVUT+CiKWygASJkq7ti1EUk4TDv1Rkda yAVPLmacB5dZun6K7jk17AomvtZRmf9ti/0esa2S9930KLStpo7W91vWTzmsOsFD/m 7UjLxB+Crq03QIrZDOgzgvC64DHj59VD8q2hWFio=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
Subject: Re: spam on the webdav list
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <140974626.2517708.1597919303261@email.ionos.com> <968ffb64-e4e0-e07c-c570-17b0d8ae57e5@gmx.de> <437007667.2518121.1597920245000@email.ionos.com> <f2adc4cb-41e2-018f-72b9-dbe6fa5bf38a@gmx.de> <519254385.2518582.1597921518526@email.ionos.com> <6226490C-B5E0-4757-9218-53DEB62233CA@akamai.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <afbf9c3d-299c-da42-dac4-94b1bc18c608@nostrum.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 09:02:00 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6226490C-B5E0-4757-9218-53DEB62233CA@akamai.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E2A6098700C4B7DA2FB702B1"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/nJI2DFnilrIegCg3Uzq1u8dbrus>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:02:52 -0000
For lists like the ones expressed so for, our local archive was created by subscribing an address to the external list. Such addresses have been susceptible to receiving spam directly, so our copy of the archive accrued messages that were never set to the original list. When this has happened, it's typically been to a list where real traffic stopped accumulating years ago. In more recent years, we have stressed having IETF hosted lists for IETF work. We do have a mechanic for moving such spam messages away, in an manner that leaves a clear record of what happened. When such puddles are discovered, sending a note to ietf-action@ietf.org about them is reasonable. RjS On 8/20/20 8:35 AM, Salz, Rich wrote: > > * Should I go through the Active > lists(mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse) and find all the ones with > spam? I'm not sure who to give that info to? > > No. > > Editing archives is a slippery slope, don’t go there. >
- spam on the webdav list Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: spam on the webdav list Julian Reschke
- Re: spam on the webdav list Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: spam on the webdav list Julian Reschke
- Re: spam on the webdav list Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: spam on the webdav list Salz, Rich
- Re: spam on the webdav list Keith Moore
- Re: spam on the webdav list Robert Sparks
- Re: spam on the webdav list Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: spam on the webdav list Timothy Mcsweeney
- Re: spam on the webdav list Timothy Mcsweeney