Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF

Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com> Tue, 23 February 2021 22:34 UTC

Return-Path: <tbray@textuality.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF2C3A0BF8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:34:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=textuality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2JM4RJhWFTbp for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:34:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x131.google.com (mail-lf1-x131.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD16E3A0CF0 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:34:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x131.google.com with SMTP id e7so104350lft.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:34:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=textuality-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=e4OccO8BTTIJ0qRTrq7jhe4wmP6fbgx1CGeBysETnQc=; b=1irg+eM8q4yL+xKAy8rhJ4XhM04monYn4MvZT/Q610kPrq6lRCw2Gvl2cFpr4HR8CN a8zxN2TV0ORA7PQMZDwCoBQkZ/+XOOIQs5WxPAXNUytf/Rk1otvl61DoQ+dwveybDy5+ mfiElzlBOUOd24d9mpC5UZM43gZepespBLkBdix4q9vfsYESv8mD/uSKgM1noPyVDl3F aIu7UKeggik6EnL2g/sytkVbluiaIev64uzMoaMYcwb3Yv56utpQDdpurdlH/yr1L2i6 UBCgtNx1ePtnQoZuLPUNnApjUBGX2DgYRkPklN98i2aKsjjkFwbWAT2idi1pgbF3afJm JU2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=e4OccO8BTTIJ0qRTrq7jhe4wmP6fbgx1CGeBysETnQc=; b=Xzpj77FHsp88QxL7I44HVicx1MG8//fclXWgPYs5hB1HNv8fTiRP9ram31zuIbnTOg CBoYxVVH++evHlpwQ8z0hXaR1L/PpSmhDjHWNJhEdScRm7xsnIhEuCPCc/uXDJZRl4U7 KwR+UUmtafigAKrj7zCzt/9axhqomvR3mVC1Slmdwr0KH8m7C0ac1E8e/Rf5T3ghLOhw j4agAg7q2Kedo/+RUjw9TH77Dnx2Kj2dnKfaIsKVkJWkmJYeCTJaud4dVBdyB3kxKkZO CFpgjGLPeTFVL7ukpAROnp0cEdbiUhYg6fB8fED1/MyT/i4n59YL+0xk29+aX3lctX8b viEQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531d3UmIydgfd/8UZ1s/4BaVfLuQiGRmmp1vWzlf3guS241yGZxr GSb7l8s0zyMJ5Ie7InLPpQOO52XeD9FcF31S6ztsKV5QQ4c=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwELElvuusW6S7os595dV42acXgevnLmWmnycawJ5vfDxxgAPaj73BypDXBMWhS2pY+RGHzkpdMgFHjTKsoL2o=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5599:: with SMTP id v25mr15304950lfg.182.1614119655587; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:34:15 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <37eecb9b-f0eb-e21c-b162-b1f0339e4981@si6networks.com> <3c2d646d-f18d-4d88-b458-29dbd486432b@beta.fastmail.com> <AM0PR08MB371669108E9CEA561BEC9EF6FA809@AM0PR08MB3716.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> <d6648437-332b-4668-a1c7-591f2c287539@dogfood.fastmail.com> <CADNypP8GKTY-Jhpb6AEfcpXOihwLap7OrrByNemGc2GNvZLeog@mail.gmail.com> <10fd9d2d-afb4-44aa-b618-fb5ce1efa69e@dogfood.fastmail.com> <c21477c8f68047cabac7aeae60a688f2@cert.org> <CAHbuEH7Qvc3AaBxbk1kXd4knS4_+Wrs3P7WNETRNNoFP-dGNCA@mail.gmail.com> <A59DA7B8-8573-4AAE-A888-7B186DED956B@mnot.net> <473aee72-6c2b-a986-df2a-aec10e376a80@network-heretics.com>
In-Reply-To: <473aee72-6c2b-a986-df2a-aec10e376a80@network-heretics.com>
From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:34:03 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHBU6itOUSyxJTQ-kwspBYCAgkmkoodWTxmDHeWYfBShUN16ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
To: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Cc: IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b2545505bc088440"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/nTYPPJblakFyXWPK3ZO7Gs2JQkI>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 22:34:26 -0000

Fair enough, but since this started around the OAuth working group, my
perception is that those RFCs don't just get published, they get adopted.
Or they used to back when I worked full time in the identity space.

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 2:01 PM Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
wrote:

> On 2/23/21 4:57 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
> > Measuring productivity through the number of documents published is not
> a good habit for us to get into; it gives incentive to all of the wrong
> kinds of behaviours.
>
> +1.
>
>
>
>