IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: IPv6 traffic stats

"TJ" <trejrco@gmail.com> Wed, 12 November 2008 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BFE3A6B4F; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:02:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380CB3A6B4F for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:02:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y1AeTcAE9bVW for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:02:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hs-out-0708.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.245]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46F213A680F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:02:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by hs-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 4so288559hsl.5 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:02:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:references :in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index:content-language; bh=ihirR7p5SQKneV0udf5oL5Zn2r8yMuuqeXssqrrOjec=; b=MN+hCqg9GF/3SjyfjmzKcxJcRoqGC3I2JkAHesU8ggIb+SBAVoNLbeehpY3wKT0gSl D05rvL/owp+Wixo80V0Otl3vPY2b/4WwR5YTTk0TxSBWCQUzWJJqkyyPK8RTYS8mrucO rpJ5dBHvgGGwRf8q9lriesAudG4N65+V5JxgA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; b=mtRNvO5ojIlgvJQJQ6XoP0ZJaFegrft/mw7u9hRJRg5pKeNW/v1Fsm7UWPL877FLpR ADTy3FB3wboly3tyRF1dOTcvxaUoKaSAlWbHyPpSypSR9BLt6Vhh+ROC7MQSTj47MR0u f6XX7nVj+cmhuoaeCqXfv5h4MZs4hcOCnuiGg=
Received: by 10.90.93.8 with SMTP id q8mr8590324agb.83.1226523761042; Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:02:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Lapci010 (pool-96-231-157-91.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.231.157.91]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p60sm4073293hsa.5.2008.11.12.13.02.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:02:39 -0800 (PST)
From: TJ <trejrco@gmail.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <08111108201165.2a71d.487911088@oregon.uoregon.edu> <20081111185711.GG1588@nsn.com> <4919ED2F.2020101@alvestrand.no> <f1110c510811111249ud4ee387m2169fb84378ec3f4@mail.gmail.com> <4919FA68.4030803@alvestrand.no> <65E18582-8F1C-4A54-B03D-AA637B79347A@tcb.net> <3F862D65-F75D-4D3E-A977-969436D6B7CB@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F862D65-F75D-4D3E-A977-969436D6B7CB@muada.com>
Subject: RE: IPv6 traffic stats
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:02:35 -0500
Message-ID: <028801c94509$fdf7fdc0$f9e7f940$@com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AclFBQW6Fy+nDaCWT0S3lanzzmmYWQABJPjg
Content-Language: en-us
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>Iljitsch van Beijnum
>On 12 nov 2008, at 21:17, Danny McPherson wrote:
>> Indeed, and according to the same stats,
>> . 0.238% of users have useful IPv6 connectivity (and prefer IPv6) .
>> 0.09% of users have broken IPv6 connectivity
>> Nearly 38% of that .238% is broken...
>No, 0.238% is the working IPv6 users, so the total is 0.328% of which 27%
is
>broken. I would be interested to see the OS breakdown for that 0.09%. I'm
>betting it's mostly Vista 6to4 users who have a public IPv4 address but are
>behind a firewall that blocks protocol 41.

Or that, sadly, have an apparently-public IP that gets NATed to another
public IP.


/TJ

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email