IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Thu, 25 February 2021 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86DF73A0A79 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:50:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NxAHMCe-36sI for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:50:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3C843A0A06 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:50:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF2F5C00FD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:50:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:50:45 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=zt0MULgv6QPWt2YpWfJE8JADtKYZ4beXD1ohn6CEG NA=; b=VCqRKcv6oJ7xlYz6Po9eU8ULKeKEyPMKIbV768Bt2HNCnHz0NduXb1hLZ 2SWrgVeWGSIOpIAs4IeP2i6/N64C4Qq+gPbm7GKX+LmeifwNbAE9UKxzFhwauqST DHIr7XcJsD87hRtW1mFqZiXXsLgvLbS5Q1QNLp6vRpESGkrCbbuoCIfIzd5R+dRd /enFoPil+ZgWpocPOrYnQXhcFHNeHK0hW8zn9Qmj1y8OzmXbUKjcok+D+e4uu1GO VYa2ZBp5hQvDsgb2OjdOFN5f2ggkxqDinQusDPWzV6hdQOwrhY6nI/7CouFAoDVv gpKDguWgwsPkCfQdW892uzPgDz8xw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:pQ04YGIi-4ksBES_4ByEeKgxaHqnqotsgQAD9dyDA2qjnuKIdiwujQ> <xme:pQ04YOLLH1dYjjbr6T3h5xzseQ_b2zD4Eksmp3VoYiQ3yex7RSGz52fUwAVbsVSDS VWKdFfyHvzWPg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrkeelgddugeehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtje ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekvdeggfelue elkeeuhfffheeghffhkeeuvdduudeihfehudefffdtgfdtkeffgfenucfkphepuddtkedr vddvuddrudektddrudehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:pQ04YGszb5GhQJJYTbl3eo3XQ372-AYSKq8H1g-OoYx8U4r4SzhH6Q> <xmx:pQ04YLZyEkoJJUILIqmktJ9tQ-t2_Yp1h-xUmnf8PJ8zXb1S2lTv1A> <xmx:pQ04YNYf9uxP2u_2OVZJkLbiKu7zEEAPDKcJIibZhEhJmWWeOpzskw> <xmx:pQ04YNrSPyAqDhcgwBp1EHGc3RPIsj5nJfY0Z1nvEt3ylXrPXyybHA>
Received: from [192.168.1.90] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 13DF9108005F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:50:45 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: [Gendispatch] Diversity and Inclusiveness in the IETF
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <37eecb9b-f0eb-e21c-b162-b1f0339e4981@si6networks.com> <3c2d646d-f18d-4d88-b458-29dbd486432b@beta.fastmail.com> <446A8D6B-E624-49E0-B67E-D1F8AFC794E2@lastpresslabel.com> <28ac1e86-f641-b9e8-0f61-6ff442feaa90@si6networks.com> <LO2P265MB057322BA95B1B44D4175356BC29E9@LO2P265MB0573.GBRP265.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <b24ce0e9-8912-12b1-af8a-6024ae83288f@si6networks.com> <25E1B1D5-E8F1-4053-A1E0-6B2948577E84@akamai.com> <3a8dca6d-0aca-d578-0f7a-3f68e2811bad@si6networks.com> <9FBF7792-8507-45F2-B06C-2173BCDF7D4C@akamai.com> <4fc62af0-cbf0-c923-5e24-fc0dfc1de996@si6networks.com> <B8DDE7D2-0105-45D5-93FB-34FF8561D888@akamai.com> <d5854cb1-ff93-6284-5106-93dd8a06f6f1@si6networks.com> <F758F440-55ED-44DE-A613-C19C3BE14160@akamai.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <78a8f55b-0eea-6f96-fa5f-10fdbd76e8bb@network-heretics.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:50:43 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F758F440-55ED-44DE-A613-C19C3BE14160@akamai.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/n_ReQm73rAWyWA0mKQ9KWouPTco>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:50:55 -0000

On 2/25/21 3:40 PM, Salz, Rich wrote:

> The rationale is that there are millions of people using GitHub, and if do documents with their toolchain, we will get more feedback from developers than if we tried to draw them into our toolchain.  I didn't realize that was what you were asking me.  This rationale was stated multiple times in the GIT WG.

It seems to me that trying to favor one group of participants over 
others is exactly the opposite of inclusiveness.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email