Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary

ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com Wed, 30 October 2013 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 771F311E8250 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c4q86VDFRSIx for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:58:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com (mauve.mrochek.com [66.59.230.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08E111E823D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkim-sign.mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01P06RDBS73K007XCW@mauve.mrochek.com> for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:53:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="UTF-8"
Received: from mauve.mrochek.com by mauve.mrochek.com (PMDF V6.1-1 #35243) id <01P067WB5KG0004X76@mauve.mrochek.com> (original mail from NED@mauve.mrochek.com) for ietf@ietf.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com
Message-id: <01P06RD9XM60004X76@mauve.mrochek.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 07:52:55 -0700
Subject: Re: IETF must use only UTC in its announcements (Was: Live Streaming of the IETF 88 Technical Plenary
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:38:33 +0100" <527119E9.5050407@cisco.com>
References: <87879E7D-A55B-4A88-80B8-B503C89E52CB@iab.org> <20131030081355.GA23990@nic.fr> <7F135C08-A550-450F-82B4-1F239E115BC3@tzi.org> <20131030083611.GA27804@nic.fr> <01P06PWP9XG4004X76@mauve.mrochek.com> <527119E9.5050407@cisco.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Cc: ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, IETF Discuss <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 14:58:32 -0000

> > Which argues for including the local time when the event will take place. If
> > you want to mandate that the time also appear in UTC, great, but it's quite
> > important that the local time also be there.

> And local time should be normative to deal with such unforeseen
> circumstances as a papal visit.  From the southamerica file in the TZ
> database:

> # From Daniel C. Sobral (1998-02-12):
> # In 1997, the DS began on October 6. The stated reason was that
> # because international television networks ignored Brazil's policy on DS,
> # they bought the wrong times on satellite for coverage of Pope's visit.
> # This year, the ending date of DS was postponed to March 1
> # to help dealing with the shortages of electric power.

> ;-)

Good point. I agree.

				Ned