Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sat, 12 April 2014 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2251A023C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:49:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.163
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.163 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.272, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_TVD_MIME_NO_HEADERS=0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LqQ7nbgq-2k8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884F21A023A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 13:49:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7F020011; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 16:49:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id A192B63ABA; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 16:49:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D64E63AB6; Sat, 12 Apr 2014 16:49:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net>
Subject: Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists
In-Reply-To: <53499A5E.9020805@meetinghouse.net>
References: <53499A5E.9020805@meetinghouse.net>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 16:49:27 -0400
Message-ID: <25006.1397335767@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ncW9ftrz1E54VQ841vQrRhtAjz4
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 20:49:30 -0000

Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@meetinghouse.net> wrote:
    > We (really I) support perhaps 2 dozen small email lists, for a bunch of
    > community groups (PTOs, churches, neighborhood groups) - mostly the
    > legacy of
    > previously running a small hosting firm, and still having the machines

ditto.

+5 on everything you said.
It is a great idea, but it is not mature, and there wasn't much in the way of
running code.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-