IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Tue, 06 April 2021 13:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BAA3A211A for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 06:24:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gwDPFQ8v2arC for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 06:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D4263A2119 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 06:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 42598 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2021 13:01:23 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 6 Apr 2021 13:01:23 -0000
Subject: Re: Fwd: Initial suggestion from the IETF SAA
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <e8155935-e85d-6f36-4b0e-e311ff1a181a@ietf.org> <d3e27fcc-2851-b14e-d991-50818ff23d43@ietf.org>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <400505a4-006b-cf76-3f29-16dbcdf4742d@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 22:24:02 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <d3e27fcc-2851-b14e-d991-50818ff23d43@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/nnahab21Hve15yYptZAQE614L7w>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2021 13:24:10 -0000

IETF Sergeant at Arms wrote:

> As requested by Lloyd, this initial suggestion is being made public.

> We are reaching out to you because of your recent message to 
> ietf@ietf.org [2]. The message contained the following language:
> 
> Establishing the TERM workgroup gives Niels and his colleagues a space 
> in which to practise and better their authoritarian thought policing 
> (sorry, 'governance'), out of the general view, in a safe area away from 
> disturbance.
> 
> which the SAA team considers unprofessional commentary [3] for being a 
> personal attack.

Regarding fair criticism on management or obviously-management-to-be
person as "personal attack" by the SAA team is obviously judged to
be offense to the public and, according to the criteria of
Brian Carpenter, the SAA team must be deleted.

Any objections?

							Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email