Re: Community Feedback for London Venue

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 16 November 2016 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1EE12960D for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:05:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wT4j0kMm3van; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:05:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A05B129641; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:05:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1c6nj7-0005x2-Fc; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:05:22 +0000
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 09:05:20 +0900
Message-ID: <m2h978s30f.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: IETF Administrative Director <iad@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Community Feedback for London Venue
In-Reply-To: <147921560801.10379.10480392218977308954.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <147921560801.10379.10480392218977308954.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/ntLMmnnNQ8mJaWujGZQd0jo7dUs>
Cc: IETF Disgust List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:05:44 -0000

>  1.  Hotel rooms were in poor condition and overpriced.
> 
>   Hotel contract negotiations produced a mix of rooms with the
>   majority of the rooms being in the refurbished tower and a smaller
>   number of rooms, not recently refurbished, but at a reduced guest
>   room rate. Attendees can make their own choice about whether they
>   wish to take the reduced rate or avoid the unrefurbished rooms.

this was my major concern.  thanks for addressing it as best one can
given the funkiness of the hotel.

>  2.  Hotel navigation was confusing.
> 
>  Better signage and a second time familiarity with the venue by some
>  should improve the attendee experience.

you underestimate the complexity of navigating the hotel.  the humor of
the secretariat helped a lot.

>  4.  The neighborhood was only tolerable

actually, i liked it.  there was fancy.  there was funky.  it was near
the deathrow express.  a convenient underground station.  a short taxi
to core london doings.

randy