IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF chair's blog

Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org> Mon, 25 February 2013 15:25 UTC

Return-Path: <petithug@acm.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A177321F9475 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:25:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.56
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.56 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.040, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ptHTKt52cYqS for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:25:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [IPv6:2604:3400:dc1:41:216:3eff:fe5b:8240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E1A21F947D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:25:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2601:9:4b80:32:69cb:6b3f:dfaa:1476] (unknown [IPv6:2601:9:4b80:32:69cb:6b3f:dfaa:1476]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Marc Petit-Huguenin", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A7A220515; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:25:49 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <512B827F.4060406@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:25:51 -0800
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130116 Icedove/10.0.12
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Tuexen <Michael.Tuexen@lurchi.franken.de>
Subject: Re: IETF chair's blog
References: <1BBAE003-DEA4-462A-998D-863F6FF90A69@ietf.org> <51298B1E.60007@lacnic.net> <512A5A10.4090406@acm.org> <8A832DDC-1D5E-4C1B-87BB-36A384937480@lacnic.net> <512B0A2D.3050102@acm.org> <512B0B20.2000403@lacnic.net> <512B0C7E.5010900@250bpm.com> <512B0E64.2030101@acm.org> <96CB57D2-68EA-4AC5-92AD-90CEA37E2A93@lurchi.franken.de>
In-Reply-To: <96CB57D2-68EA-4AC5-92AD-90CEA37E2A93@lurchi.franken.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 15:25:53 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 02/25/2013 03:11 AM, Michael Tuexen wrote:
> On Feb 25, 2013, at 8:10 AM, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> 
> On 02/24/2013 11:02 PM, Martin Sustrik wrote:
>>>> On 25/02/13 07:56, Arturo Servin wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> If it were to collaborate, an ietf application with open standards
>>>>> should be the way forward.
>>>> 
>>>> Moreover, entities controlling these social platforms are,
>>>> presumably, also participating in IETF. So, using these tools would
>>>> give one party unfair advantage -- ability to promote or obscure
>>>> individual discussions/threads/posts, ban users etc.
> 
> Exactly.  And it bothers me that we are not making much progress in having
> our own remote participant service and have to rely on Webex.
>> Couldn't we use one based on RTCWeb (in the near future)?

Why not, but it's just technology.  For me the most important point is that it
is managed on IETF (or IETF's contractor) servers.  By that criteria a private
license of Webex running on IETF's servers is better than the far more open
Meetecho running somewhere else (but if both where running on IETF servers,
open software is better than close software).

- -- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org
Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/petithug
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=MOA/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status