IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Weekly curated news stories about IETF-related topics

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Fri, 16 October 2020 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24313A0141 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.213, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IIAS56GdsdXn for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4EEC3A0140 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3637B5C0187 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:25:02 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:25:02 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=mIF7OvIfX3zQ2F62lY5TClnkzrVBEy46Lurz58bmW GY=; b=R3j/r4+SnxWXCk3Raf8XiV5ImR436D0q9u/VhHBi3bMnKRAYdzOq0ofDm GFQNaNTuCUAIzJksNr4inQVtVwllpyzVvxe6FwZ2JwVGZu8cUH5aUU0+XD7WOX8p frp4yi6qFVlX3Z1HhkWPA/glnRLDYitWbuCC+slG/yIh8rmvAYgXbu2wjzv1GwQV HAvp+TtdtDfmXDaDaBK3M3KXF6/JcpjjeEpk9MBN+qKRY+peX4Jc1WfRpz1cDsaT smyKrLBqM4ya2gkwJF0bxt2KwFnqYmsIZbVi4dV8rGkPLcz7LOE1gFjcXexkNg0E mlESGjcqLul3uomUCNrYwh8ZY82OQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:feWJXxN1_gZSkUIdBHBGYWD6KeL9euysXiV2gqe8zkGPC8908NTZUw> <xme:feWJXz8HAUdDZppUb6tVlpHWvlCGUGhmgwYGhv0VKg8J-FYMKF1-cS8YI7uRbP8Ti 7XtOJkERRBJgg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrieehgdduvdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtje ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekvdeggfelue elkeeuhfffheeghffhkeeuvdduudeihfehudefffdtgfdtkeffgfenucfkphepuddtkedr vddvuddrudektddrudehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:feWJXwQIZ2-KEjNxX98yi5TZuya6TsgQ5viPlAG5vhStH9Yf7JQuzQ> <xmx:feWJX9ttpSDzsW_JhUrIvjiwa1XsLgvxvjtu_nVS0zen8ZgZiMhN9A> <xmx:feWJX5dMSvMMSRIZp8-GhEiAnCuDHYGLP0b84Wr8L1d1jVQU8J1koA> <xmx:fuWJX087kUj42Xl2TsF1h3lD-iRKol8Gk51WXhHowDc_xSz3Q5Abjg>
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AF7F53280064 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:25:01 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: Weekly curated news stories about IETF-related topics
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <5FAE5D8E-9748-438F-B46D-B3C5EAD2603D@ietf.org> <90f3bd88-d1ef-cc7a-c683-cf40a92d52e3@gmail.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <f378f889-52f6-ec85-f078-8df6eea65868@network-heretics.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 14:25:00 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <90f3bd88-d1ef-cc7a-c683-cf40a92d52e3@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/nwgQYKyvGiDOLdAtugjZ0mHN1U8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 18:25:05 -0000

On 10/15/20 8:46 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:

> We constantly have to push back on claims that drafts are IETF standards; it's a bit disturbing when such false claims appear in our own output.

Or maybe it's useful for IETF participants to have more exposure to how 
we're (mis-) reported in the media?

Still, a disclaimer does seem appropriate.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email