Re: Please, not more process (was: [IAB] Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm)

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 13 August 2012 05:45 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EA821F853C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.332
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6LhPVwLnRCXL for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FD821F84D9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Aug 2012 22:45:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de
Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q7D5hX1q028376; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:43:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.217.105] (p5489298A.dip.t-dialin.net [84.137.41.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A4E4BAF; Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:43:33 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: Please, not more process (was: [IAB] Last Call: Modern Global Standards Paradigm)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.0 \(1485\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <20120813025849.GA93948@mail.yitter.info>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 07:43:31 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <428D7E1D-3641-4F94-BD3B-55D045C99AE2@tzi.org>
References: <u2b8y2x43qn1esn7ege163mo.1344689258582@email.android.com> <50266F05.5050601@dcrocker.net> <1C6BB491-8B0B-4432-B633-6D8AA3B6477E@tzi.org> <50267826.70307@bbiw.net> <CAC4RtVARm1fXvHR4dv9Jh0HttW+ORhRx36kwF54RRjc4aOh1AQ@mail.gmail.com> <5027D0B2.80306@bbiw.net> <CALaySJKzxo=oHLcDxT=RbrwMK=pTSh6vxY-VvLZ0C5wf+T-DQQ@mail.gmail.com> <5027D67B.2030409@dcrocker.net> <5027ED27.2040403@cisco.com> <DDFE0F39-380E-49DB-B0E5-451AB659AFAE@tzi.org> <20120813025849.GA93948@mail.yitter.info>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1485)
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2012 05:45:46 -0000

On Aug 13, 2012, at 04:58, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote:

> Why is it useful?  

Because it elicits considered reactions like yours and Mike StJohns', and allows us to make explicit and affirm the (rough) consensus that we seem to share about the role and purview of our leadership.  (I'm not asking for another RFC, I'm just asking that we do consciously what we are doing, also so it may serve as a precedent.)

Grüße, Carsten

(This is likely my last message on this subject.)