Re: how to contact the IETF

Alex Loret de Mola <edgarverona@gmail.com> Tue, 10 February 2009 01:23 UTC

Return-Path: <edgarverona@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD8F28C2DB for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:23:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ns6kRr0QQHLC for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:23:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com (yw-out-2324.google.com [74.125.46.30]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2213A6919 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:23:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 5so1295026ywh.49 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:23:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mxaFqCncMTiYu31S4iqT/U6HDqonS40pVAMHv9b5dzA=; b=idUtouobwcl2leGPHi2tBiHetfryLrJc8zV3ZFKZtQoVcu08xAksdJa5dUFSJKvPh4 HG1f2pFdwbJvY4GcEqgCkAgxL74GHcD1gcZZEUqfQf2YHr3IcD0HEwKxIIvVUZgOKPAC 0SiEBkKVCkMiLoP9mWSjXiLz6w/r1Xl5oFHvo=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=E8rZIPf7MC1CbvsrFVrNd4+WucG8N+AWACaHLWDvlDLBvUEzx0A2k5Qhg9B6PYQLVf DzjimDMCa4ndhJeHsfH2hKNDRyYtAyric0StGeM4IjXrZgBD5143hduQgDB7vwirHYM/ 0vG8exF2TDpMBN25DRJsvFnWvoj5B4CtDty4c=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.90.65.14 with SMTP id n14mr1143346aga.61.1234229035546; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 17:23:55 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <p06240804c5b680470e7a@67.52.141.198>
References: <20090210000706.C25A96BE5FE@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <789dbae90902091628p564774fdkbec538ced43828ae@mail.gmail.com> <p06240804c5b680470e7a@67.52.141.198>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:23:55 -0500
Message-ID: <789dbae90902091723o5c1672a4v18139d6b86e841c6@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: how to contact the IETF
From: Alex Loret de Mola <edgarverona@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:23:55 -0000

Dear Steve:

Indeed, I can see your perspective on this now, with the aid of
information that I was unaware of previously.  I did not recall this
situation happening before (either I wasn't paying attention at that
time, or I was not yet a member of the list at that time, I joined -
if I recall correctly - sometime in 2007 or 2006, but I cannot recall
exactly), but from what it sounds like that last instance of such an
event was meritless enough to justify the suspicion and pessimism seen
here.  I hereby withdraw my appeal to optimism unless suitable
situations arise to prove otherwise.

However, I volunteer to attempt to make contact with the FSF and see
if they know about the potentially more constructive avenues available
to them.  (so far, I've been suggested that they join the IUCG,
subscribe and discuss in a two-way manner on the list, and contact the
working group directly... are there any further suggestions that can
be made?)  I can attempt to establish contact tomorrow, after I return
from my other job, unless someone wants to establish contact more
quickly.  As it stands I'm already late.

On that subject, I need to draft a proposal for an extension of hours
in the day from 24 to 36 or more. ;)  I'll be back later to resume
discussion and contact the FSF if someone else hasn't already.

Sincerely,

Alex Loret de Mola



On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:55 PM, Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> wrote:
> Alex,
>
> The conclusion I draw from this experience differs from yours. If the
> individuals who sent the messages in question choose to become involved
> constructively, then there can be some benefit. But, the act of sending the
> messages in question has generated ill will, so it was a bad way to begin a
> constructive, contributory process.
>
> Steve
>