IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 05 October 2018 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC14130E54; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vCcRwrtRMyrP; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:59:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3029130DC1; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w95GxQeP021872; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 17:59:26 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F6222048; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 17:59:26 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EE152204C; Fri, 5 Oct 2018 17:59:26 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 950129200 (4.43.114.87.dyn.plus.net [87.114.43.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w95GxOGS003751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 5 Oct 2018 17:59:25 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Jari Arkko' <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, iasa2-chairs@ietf.org, iasa20@ietf.org, draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update@ietf.org
References: <153756470188.20283.12048259576780413892.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <093e01d452ae$ae761b70$0b625250$@olddog.co.uk> <470DBAE7-167C-4084-8D90-EF9566A2D86A@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <470DBAE7-167C-4084-8D90-EF9566A2D86A@piuha.net>
Subject: RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-iasa2-trust-update-00.txt> (Update to the Selection of Trustees for the IETF Trust) to Best Current Practice
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 17:59:18 +0100
Message-ID: <0e6901d45ccc$c2777740$476665c0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQKbwH0g57TrvY8xQv+iW7fKkKZUpgIl+RqdAdsK7N+jYhA+YA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.114.43.4
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-24138.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--10.894-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--10.894-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-24138.001
X-TMASE-Result: 10--10.893700-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: lORh06tOiKhfsB4HYR80ZggKAWhuC2ojCckvlPjoBZFA5/slgqwWV9P8 W0t/rMaUg2AJ83NyWTckTpaDR3J9kJH0YXYnbGozgxsfzkNRlfLywbv87mVahd5/HgWYxplM7a1 x925kg6/dB/CxWTRRu25FeHtsUoHuv/Xzyp54fpfPwYaMOmSo2LjVAS5c1ysVB32nIzRTPzVYKV gm72vjJg==
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/o6xGqUus0MnyXPXzd4p6xgX1q6o>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 16:59:31 -0000

Hi Jari,

> > Does this mean this document updates 7437?
> 
> I think not, because this document uses 7437… would be happy to hear if people
> think otherwise.

Happy to go with that.

Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email