Re: Flighhts: "direct" vs "non-stop"

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Mon, 06 August 2012 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F73E21F85F4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 09:37:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.051, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xzzDfFdhRkPU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 09:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33B821F85EF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 09:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1SyQIj-000JZM-0H; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:37:05 +0000
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 09:37:04 -0700
Message-ID: <m24nog7z9r.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Subject: Re: Flighhts: "direct" vs "non-stop"
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVAFPLdOHmJ=YO1XRXTv9E+Sy8sZi-ppVLgurChcqFZvnQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAC4RtVAFPLdOHmJ=YO1XRXTv9E+Sy8sZi-ppVLgurChcqFZvnQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 16:37:06 -0000

> A "direct flight" is not the same as a "non-stop flight".  If you're
> talking about a flight that goes from airport ABC to airport QRS, making no
> stops along the way, it's a non-stop flight from ABC to QRS.
> 
> A "direct flight" from ABC to QRS, is a flight that has one flight
> number... but that flight might make stops, and could even involve a change
> of planes.

while i agree with you completely, and the misuse annoys me.  i fear it
may be like routers and switches.  we have lost the distinction.

my fave used to be ua flight 3, ord-ogg-koa-ord, direct ord-ord :)

randy