Re: Agenda item request
John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com> Wed, 20 October 2021 16:54 UTC
Return-Path: <john-ietf@jck.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAEB3A087C; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0rBwsXZMW1Oc; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:54:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bsa2.jck.com (bsa2.jck.com [70.88.254.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF7193A0819; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 09:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [198.252.137.10] (helo=PSB) by bsa2.jck.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <john-ietf@jck.com>) id 1mdEqv-0004iq-Nh; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:54:09 -0400
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 12:54:03 -0400
From: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, gendispatch@ietf.org
cc: ietf@ietf.org, Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
Subject: Re: Agenda item request
Message-ID: <C89DD0642CF7A15DECA77978@PSB>
In-Reply-To: <4BDF1DD9-9D30-499F-8C26-1E7790F2A729@akamai.com>
References: <4BDF1DD9-9D30-499F-8C26-1E7790F2A729@akamai.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 198.252.137.10
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john-ietf@jck.com
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on bsa2.jck.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/oFIyQdqf-QzY_4mxAOCdQY49iyM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 16:54:17 -0000
I concur with Rich's request and favor a discussion but, if we are going to do that, I request that draft-klensin-nomcom-term (yes, from 2005-2006) be added as well. Unless Spencer has vigorous objections, I'll try to find the original and get a version with current dates, affiliations, etc., posted within the next several days. The abstract of that I-D read: A consensus is emerging in the IETF that very long tenure in leadership roles is not in the best interests of the community. While, in theory, that advice could simply be given to the NomCom, there is reason to believe that a different model for consideration of renewal or replacement for members of the leadership would be more efficient for the NomCom and would impose less hardship on incumbents and the community. This document outlines that alternate method. In addition to proposing an approach that would limit most Nomcom appointees to two terms and change the way Nomcoms review appointees, Section 3 (of -01) reviews the discussions at the time about other alternatives including hard term limits. john --On Wednesday, October 20, 2021 14:37 +0000 "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > I would like to have this on the next GENDISPATCH agenda. > > Name: draft-rsalz-termlimits > Revision: 00 > Title: Term limits for IETF Leadership Positions > Document date: 2021-10-20 > Group: Individual Submission
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Lars Eggert
- Agenda item request Salz, Rich
- Re: Agenda item request John C Klensin
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Michael StJohns
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Barry Leiba
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Barry Leiba
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Carsten Bormann
- draft-leiba-term-limit-guidance-00 [was: draft-rs… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits John Levine
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits John C Klensin
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Barry Leiba
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Barry Leiba
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Carsten Bormann
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits John C Klensin
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits John C Klensin
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits John C Klensin
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Barry Leiba
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Salz, Rich
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Keith Moore
- Re: [Gendispatch] draft-rsalz-termlimits Scott O. Bradner