IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF chair's blog

Martin Sustrik <sustrik@250bpm.com> Mon, 25 February 2013 07:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sustrik@250bpm.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CA721F91F4 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:02:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.694
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.694 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SK=1.35, HOST_EQ_SK=0.555]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a2zg130v3G7N for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:02:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.moloch.sk (chrocht.moloch.sk [62.176.169.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 492EB21F91F9 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:02:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.134] (188-167-109-79.dynamic.chello.sk [188.167.109.79]) by mail.moloch.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEF7A1802020; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:02:22 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <512B0C7E.5010900@250bpm.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:02:22 +0100
From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@250bpm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/3.1.16
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
Subject: Re: IETF chair's blog
References: <1BBAE003-DEA4-462A-998D-863F6FF90A69@ietf.org> <51298B1E.60007@lacnic.net> <512A5A10.4090406@acm.org> <8A832DDC-1D5E-4C1B-87BB-36A384937480@lacnic.net> <512B0A2D.3050102@acm.org> <512B0B20.2000403@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <512B0B20.2000403@lacnic.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:02:30 -0000

On 25/02/13 07:56, Arturo Servin wrote:

> 	If it were to collaborate, an ietf application with open standards
> should be the way forward.

Moreover, entities controlling these social platforms are, presumably, 
also participating in IETF. So, using these tools would give one party 
unfair advantage -- ability to promote or obscure individual 
discussions/threads/posts, ban users etc.

Martin

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status