Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 07 April 2016 16:30 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665D012D139 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:30:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dy56W0Y6T9Ph for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:30:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 099ED12D1ED for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id l6so5663189wml.3 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 09:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=C4HGF0F6/B4bh1WoIFIOcTKi/qDpgqJg0BTzRRRJIO4=; b=vy5S8wi51hBEDLmZVo8j71bWk/6jrFsgGaoAW6kteFjifyjFt9N1LUPpR8r8kChND8 Tdzd/Zd06V5rBMjn4ngN7vCNEr5QzV1noz30DQYx8xHeaQgZgbzQ5G3rLqaywMHvsFBm 72DGKHhS7PzijiQCTpzMmCPtNL6zq2mQH++ZF7VIbk+q3B6fmctm4mQJvczeDO8cGnJk dPJaOuswpDErcsTnA8ZFveeeWgHjb+h/5XwIuIDFMdlf/AFOkriyN1usS3TF2JyfVesP cWjM1H9Oy4wcOYEFUQgDjO3hiWf6HT6vqXedBY8hfxE7IMPUAVniVLPLQ4mpFuTLHbS1 seUQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=C4HGF0F6/B4bh1WoIFIOcTKi/qDpgqJg0BTzRRRJIO4=; b=lOP06EkVIQokQ6TvpRB9zZa685vlK25lqVWTv4nnvVKiwG9r+cG0X17wJpaEC9Roc6 SYXhi74PXy0X7YhnF+wf0+xoJnKxJyUiKKpjZOtecDdboukR+HA1Yf5fcyYB5X4JLNsC PyjNzQ9Zj1eG6LJ/YrBY79s5SXgAgvOQvSRuBFJgNBnXqXYpdu7jNzoIue+/sSuimC9h +A7/nuNMLTrQ7SGTnR8N23iIdlrRL/kqfbkJGjVsKeKF/O94XK0C7q9uqVgzlUHqFel3 DKUVKBKkS0QXAVOS7zFa3kFm3BkTr8GrjtIdsU0sByP4N1lVW7jvPtLrZJgBLw8CpmkZ fszg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL0sS71w2wn6MmWFrmSnvJZSYhVMBeDPzGC7DPfRo3yp46s3yJiWedrLwVEyDtjTg==
X-Received: by 10.28.176.133 with SMTP id z127mr32117651wme.66.1460046644603; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 09:30:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.113] (host213-123-124-182.in-addr.btopenworld.com. [213.123.124.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b135sm4296955wmb.10.2016.04.07.09.30.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 07 Apr 2016 09:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Subject: Re: "We did not know" is not a good excuse
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13E238)
In-Reply-To: <570677BC.9000900@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 17:30:42 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <203EFD6F-183D-4C92-9006-3BFE24BB525B@gmail.com>
References: <09ff01d1905c$f15d4e70$d417eb50$@olddog.co.uk> <5705C39E.30807@dcrocker.net> <0a5801d19086$79f40e30$6ddc2a90$@olddog.co.uk> <570677BC.9000900@dcrocker.net>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/oJIvvY2fojaWF5zOLq_h4HLYqMY>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 16:30:50 -0000


> On 7 Apr 2016, at 16:07, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>; wrote:
> 
>  And I'll suggest that this is not an issue that one should try to 'game', such as by trying to obscure the choice by floating various venue possibilities or otherwise hoping that we haven't signaled the choice to a specific city/hotel.

Such a process served us well in getting feedback on members of the I* until recently.

I would have thought that it would pick up problems of the type that was identified last night without compromising our commercial position too badly.

Stewart