IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers

"Frank Ellermann" <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de> Fri, 30 May 2008 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F387A3A698A; Fri, 30 May 2008 05:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3B33A697B for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2008 05:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U66AaZFEQU4i for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2008 05:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033953A698C for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2008 05:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1K23kc-000730-GY for ietf@ietf.org; Fri, 30 May 2008 12:30:30 +0000
Received: from hmbg-d9b88e1c.pool.mediaways.net ([217.184.142.28]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2008 12:30:30 +0000
Received: from nobody by hmbg-d9b88e1c.pool.mediaways.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2008 12:30:30 +0000
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Subject: Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers
Date: Fri, 30 May 2008 14:31:52 +0200
Organization: <http://purl.net/xyzzy>
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <g1os0u$3ac$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <483F2881.40306@ericsson.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: hmbg-d9b88e1c.pool.mediaways.net
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1914
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Suresh Krishnan wrote:

> We would really appreciate
[...]
In the spirit of your draft:  s /one an author/once an author/ ;-)

As the draft says, the main thing is to get any reviews at all:
A "negative" review means that somebody bothered to read it, and
to note whatever attracted their attention.  I'm not sure if 
that needs a separate "review netiquette RFC", IMO it should be
a part of the "Tao", or the next Tao if it is not already clear.

Please use the term "review team" instead of "directorate".

 Frank

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email