Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Tue, 10 March 2015 21:51 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A043D1A8BB7; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:51:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MaNAQrYiOFUT; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B5B1A8AF7; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5692CEEE; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:51:04 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BIVTRd271rZM; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:51:03 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14652CECD; Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:51:03 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_542DFE6A-35EE-422F-B7A7-8EBBB412B107"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <54FE1450.5020601@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 23:51:04 +0200
Message-Id: <066ADB33-12D8-4B59-AD51-8168B50D44FF@piuha.net>
References: <CADhXe52X+-1yjNUPWGCmbRhgHguMPTC+X6DTYsN=CMY46-sGhw@mail.gmail.com> <000601d04a1c$60ee3cf0$22cab6d0$@olddog.co.uk> <54E243AE.9040408@dcrocker.net> <8FCB5BBD-8651-4C42-A520-C0B1B96FBE4C@piuha.net> <54FE1450.5020601@dcrocker.net>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/oWSADeucQZbC3w6pqYrebE4Fif0>
Cc: draft-farrresnickel-harassment@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 21:51:07 -0000
Dave, > While the draft proposes important differences from the interim process > you established, its premise and core principles are the same. We > therefore ought to be able to glean valuable lessons from the nearly > one-year of experience. The approach indeed is the same. There have been some learnings along the way; as an example, the draft emphasises also the role of ‘normal’ procedures (such as code of conduct, mailing list management, etc). As for the experiences from something more in the category that this draft can deal with… I don’t have a lot of data to make conclusions. The numbers are very small, fortunately. There is some anecdotal data that talking about the issue in the community, having a person that you can reach out to, and making it clear that some things are inappropriate is helpful. There is also a learning curve for the people involved in the process (myself included). And I think we’ve learned a few things on how we respond to experiences that people talk to us about. I’m not sure we can yet draw much more conclusions. I think we have some basis for believing that the answer to your question zero is a yes, but the others we’ll have to tackle further down the road. Jari
- I-D.farrresnickel-harassment James Woodyatt
- RE: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment Adrian Farrel
- RE: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment Adrian Farrel
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment Dave Crocker
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment Jari Arkko
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment Dave Crocker
- Re: I-D.farrresnickel-harassment Jari Arkko