Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network)

"Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat IT&Internet)" <nd@syndicat.com> Fri, 25 July 2014 19:31 UTC

Return-Path: <nd@syndicat.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A414B1A02D5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.603
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_28=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id frM0z-3MPZsc for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.syndicat.com (mail.syndicat.com [62.146.89.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 222B91A03D4 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 12:31:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.syndicat.com ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by mail.syndicat.com with esmtp (Syndicat.com PostHamster 10.04_1-PostHamster) (envelope-from <nd@syndicat.com>) id 1XAlD8-0003im-My; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:31:22 +0200
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at syndicat.com
Received: from mail.syndicat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.syndicat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zuYHVxyvtJYy; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:31:22 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from p5dc3e9a3.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.195.233.163] helo=[10.1.1.105]) by mail.syndicat.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Syndicat.com PostHamster 10.04_1-PostHamster) (envelope-from <nd@syndicat.com>) id 1XAlD8-0005ya-9v; Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:31:22 +0200
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <p06240610cff85a0ef12e@[192.168.6.56]>
References: <0FE63216-9BE8-450F-80FB-D1DB6166DFEF@ietf.org> <CFF7BBD1.28A2F%wesley.george@twcable.com> <8B1DA3E3-F195-4CBC-B565-85CAFC31CB1B@shinkuro.com> <3708BC187C6387C727398CBB@JCK-EEE10> <53D25E42.1010903@bogus.com> <4ECAD61D-C3CE-4A6E-B4DE-F3A57EA6601A@shinkuro.com> <p06240610cff85a0ef12e@[192.168.6.56]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: Hotel networks (Was Re: Security for the IETF wireless network)
From: "Niels Dettenbach (Syndicat IT&Internet)" <nd@syndicat.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 21:30:04 +0200
To: Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>, Steve Crocker <steve@shinkuro.com>, joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
Message-ID: <7fdb0691-9abf-43e3-8e99-85d5704d2398@email.android.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/oYBatA1CTWX4tiHfG5UrDn3o6tg
Cc: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2014 19:31:37 -0000

On 25. Juli 2014 21:02:49 MESZ, Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>I wish the IETF NOC could take over the networks of every hotel in 
>every city we visit, but I don't expect them to be able to.

sorry for my noise, but this may shorten the discussion:

Why not simply buy some kind of prepaid SIM card in the target country for i.e. 5-10 EUR/USD incl. some kind of "starter volume"? I hardly assume that most of you have some kind of mobile 3.xG mobile terminal which is able to serve your personal area network (PAN) by wifi, bluetooth or cable for these days? Additionally there are meshes or hotspot initiatives who are open to guests for free in many larger towns.

Since i was in a canadian branch of Mar*** hotel who "transparently relayed" all SMTP and HTTP over their main location while blocking any TLS and SSL / SSH / VPN tunneling i know what i have to assume about such kind of "free hotel networks".

At least for typical  pro IP users who knows to "use" available  IP bandwidth this should be acceptable and a oeconomic alternative.


just my two cents,


Niels.
-- 
Niels Dettenbach
Syndicat IT&Internet
http://www.syndicat.com